The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis

869 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality (2019, background): “Open innovation theory has begun to provide important insights into the heightened role of knowledge accessing and networks in facilitating innovation and spurring the openness of innovation processes (Chesbrough 2003, 2011; Chesbrough et al. 2006; Laursen and Salter 2006; Gassmann 2006; Dahlander a”
Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs? (2019, background): “However, less is known about their influence when looking specifically at inbound and outbound OI (Bogers et al. 2017).”
Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden (2019, methodology): “Drawing on the levels of analysis initially proposed by West, Vanhaverbeke, and Chesbrough (2006), and increasingly embraced among OI scholars (e.g. Bogers et al. 2017; Mergel 2017), we adopt a classification of the main barrier types identified in extant literature as illustrated in Table 1.”
Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem (2017, background): “Many aspects of this field have yet to be explored, however, and our understanding of the open innovation concept therefore remains underdeveloped (Bogers et al., 2017; West and Bogers, 2014, 2017).”