Does one good turn deserve another? coworker influences on employee citizenship

By William H. Bommer, E. Miles, S. Grover. 2003

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9c8baa31f83812bd6557d842568ca913845451d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. I. D. Pater
2. F. A. V. Dijk
3. Adam M. Grant
4. Dean Tjosvold
5. E. Vigoda-Gadot
6. A. V. Vianen
7. Kibeom Lee
8. A. Somech

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. A. Somech
2. E. Vigoda-Gadot
3. Shefali V. Patil
4. Adam M. Grant
5. Patrick D. Dunlop
6. I. D. Pater
7. F. A. V. Dijk
8. R. S. Rubin

In Social Psychology

1. Shefali V. Patil
2. Patrick D. Dunlop
3. E. Vigoda-Gadot
4. Adam M. Grant
5. Kirk Chang
6. Chuchai Smithikrai
7. A. Somech
8. Zi-you Yu

Citations in the corpus

• Does prevalence mitigate relevance? The moderating effect of group-level OCB on employee performance. (2007, background): “, 1993) four-item measures of altruism and sportsmanship, both of which have demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties (Bommer et al., 2003; Moorman, Niehoff, & Organ, 1993; Niehoff & Moorman, 1993).”
• Work value fit and turnover intention: same‐source or different‐source fit (2007, background): “For example, although high consensus among team members is not necessary if one is interested in examining the quality of the work environment, the influence of group-level perceptions may depend on the degree to which perceptions are shared ( Bommer et al. , 2003”
• Team effectiveness in China: Cooperative conflict for relationship building (2005, background): “(Adler & Kwon, 2002; Bommer et al., 2003; Duffy et al., 2002; McNatt, 2000).”
• Group-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Education System: A Scale Reconstruction and Validation (2007, methodology): “Following Bommer et al. (2003) and Ehrhart and Naumann (2004), the social learning theory (Bandura, 1986) and the social information-processing theory (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978) can be useful in establishing the relationships, but also the distinction, between individual-level and group-level OCB.”
• Challenging the Norm of Self-Interest: Minority Influence and Transitions to Helping Norms in Work Units (2012, background): “In addition, modeling helping behavior is likely to attract reciprocity (Gouldner, 1960), increasing the descriptively normative level of helping behavior occurring in the unit (Bommer et al., 2003).”
• Counterproductive behaviour at work: an investigation into reduction strategies (2010, background): “As previously mentioned, OCB is contagious in nature (Bommer et al. 2003).”