“Incivility, social undermining, bullying…oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research

By M. S. Hershcovis. 2011

875 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e935ef1c91d7bf64241456987dd166a7b6ec2738

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review (2012, background): “…researchers seem to have focused on more overarching constructs that combine various forms of ill treatment and hostile behaviour in the workplace setting, rather than on investigating subforms of workplace aggression such as workplace bullying (cf. Fox & Stallworth, 2005; Hershcovis, 2011).”
Day-level fluctuations in stress and engagement in response to workplace incivility: A diary study (2014, background): “Meta-analytic results (Hershcovis, 2011) highlight the negative impact of such events.”
Voice Climate, Supervisor Undermining, and Work Outcomes (2015, background): “While there is some debate as to the distinctiveness of these constructs (Hershcovis, 2011; Tepper & Henle, 2011), research evidence suggests that aggressive behavior on the part of the supervisor has the strongest effects on subordinate perceptions and behaviors (Hershcovis & Barling, 2010).”
Exposure to workplace harassment and the Five Factor Model of personality: A meta-analysis (2017, methodology): “With regard to individuals, both cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence suggests that exposure to psychological harassment in the workplace has detrimental effects on the targets ́ health and wellbeing (see Bowling & Beehr, 2006; Hershcovis, 2011; Nielsen & Einarsen, 2012; Nielsen, Indregard, & Ø”
Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research (2016, background): “Specifically, Hershcovis (2011) noted that extant research on the various forms of workplace aggression failed to measure those criteria that differentiate the distinct forms of mistreatment from one another.”
Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea (2013, background): “An important reason for the current interest is the increase in frequency of destructive supervisor behaviors in the workplace (Griffin & Lopez, 2005; Hershcovis, 2011), and their considerable impact on organizational and individual outcomes (Aryee et al., 2007; Tepper, 2007).”
Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis (2018, positive): “As suggested by previous authors (Bowling & Beehr, 2006; Hershcovis, 2011), papers for which information was not obtained were excluded from the analysis ( n = 4).”
Tackling the Problem of Construct Proliferation (2016, background): “One possibility is that the constructs of interest are distinct, but the scales used to assess the constructs do not differentiate between them (cf. Cole et al., 2012; Hershcovis, 2011).”
The Relationship between Coworker Incivility, Emotional Exhaustion, and Organizational Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion (2015, background): “Furthermore, due to its inherent nature of ambiguous intent with low intensity, it is much more difficult to identify workplace incivility (Hershcovis, 2011; Sliter, Sliter, et al., 2012).”
Fear and risk in the audit process (2014, background): “Social violence and humiliation are common in workplaces (Czarniawska, 2008; Hershcovis, 2011; Neuman & Baron, 1998).”