The Determinants of Team-Based Innovation in Organizations

By D. Caldwell, Charles A. O'Reilly. 2003

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dff0f0659dd0a9e350d96cd22bbc159edd31db71

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanical Engineering

In Social Psychology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Climate for Creativity: A Quantitative Review (2007, methodology): “The validation strategy applied in most studies involved examining the relationship between climate dimensions and self-and/or supervisory ratings of creativity (eg, Amabile & Conti, 1996 ; Bunce & West, 1995 ; Caldwell & O'Reilly, 2003 ; Mohamed, 2002 ).”
Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation (2013, background): “This is how teams in organizations can facilitate or inhibit innovation (e.g., Anderson & West, 1998; Caldwell & O’Reilly, 2003; Drach-Zahavy & Somech, 2001; Eisenbeiss, van Knippenberg, & Boerner, 684 Acknowledgment: This article was accepted under the editorship of Talya N. Bauer.”
Innovation in Services: Corporate Culture and Investment Banking (2007, background): “Furthermore, employees should feel safe making mistakes.(61) A certain degree of failure is a necessary and valuable part of the innovation process.”
Innovative Behaviour, Trust and Perceived Workplace Performance (2018, unknown): “But, teams in which members frequently display IB are likely to generate a climate supporting innovation (Anderson and West, 1998) consisting of participative safety, (social) support, and knowledge sharing (Caldwell and O'Reilly, 2003; De Clercq et al., 2010; Ozer, 2011).”
Shaping tasks and relationships at work: Examining the antecedents and consequences of employee job crafting (2007, background): “In anoth er study, group climates that provided support for creativity and risk taking and tolerance for mistakes were found to be associated with increased team innovation (Caldwell & O’Reilly , 2003).”
Explaining factors affecting individual innovation: The case of producer group members in Thailand (2012, background): “Beckman (1999) defined knowledge management as the formal process that concerns access to experience, knowledge, and expertise that creates new”
Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams (2005, background): “Caldwell and O’Reilly (2003) found that support for risk taking and tolerance of mistakes were two cultural norms that promoted behaviors associated with innovation.”
Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not) (2012, background): “More recently, Caldwell & O’Reilly (2003) found that norms that (1) support risk taking, (2) tolerate mistakes, (3) encourage teamwork, and (4) increase speed of action all contribute to group creativity.”