The mediating role of psychological contract violation on the relations between psychological contract breach and work‐related attitudes and behaviors

By Mark M. Suazo. 2009

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

– The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of psychological contract violation (PCV) as a mediating variable in the relations between psychological contract breach (PCB) and work‐related attitudes and behaviors. In addition, this study aims to expand the generalizability of psychological contract theories by examining service‐oriented employees rather than a population of managers as in most research on PCB., – A survey was administered to 196 service‐oriented employees working in the USA. Factor analyses (principal components, varimax rotation) were conducted on all the variables in the study to determine the factorial independence of the constructs. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to test the main effects and mediating hypotheses., – The findings are consistent with the proposed mediation model of the study. PCV was found to fully mediate the relations between PCB and job satisfaction, organizational commitment, intentions to quit, perceived organizational support, service delivery, service‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior, and participation service‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior. PCV was found to partially mediate the relation between PCB and loyalty service‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior. PCV was not found to mediate the relation between PCB and in‐role job performance., – The use of a cross‐sectional non‐experimental design does not allow for definitive conclusions regarding causality and there is a possibility that the results may be influenced by common method variance., – Managers need to carefully consider and manage the psychological contracts of their subordinates from a cognitive perspective (PCB) and an affective perspective (PCV)., – The paper empirically examines the PCB‐PCV Outcomes model using a sample of service‐oriented employees.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd9bfd092fac33962ba11dabe6a3c4de7227e9f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. M. Bolino
  2. W. H. Turnley
  3. Mark M. Suazo
  4. G. Notelaers
  5. Carlos-María Alcover
  6. Ramón Rico
  7. E. F. Stone-Romero
  8. Denise Salin

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. G. Notelaers
  2. M. Bolino
  3. Denise Salin
  4. Mark M. Suazo
  5. W. H. Turnley
  6. Staale Einarsen
  7. E. F. Stone-Romero
  8. Carlos-María Alcover

Citations in the corpus