Exchange relationships: examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support.
By Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro, N. Conway. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005
650 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d21b2ac00d314e2e055c81b63ba635b945d77b68
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- P. M. Bal
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Annet de Lange
- Paul G. W. Jansen
- H. Zacher
- D. Feldman
- Sharon K. Parker
- Denise M. Rousseau
In Social Psychology
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- P. M. Bal
- H. Zacher
- D. Feldman
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Annet de Lange
- Jane E. Dutton
- Paul G. W. Jansen
Citations in the corpus
- Psychological Contracts, Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support: Investigating the Impact on Intent to Leave Among Hospitality Employees in India (2015, methodology): “…are more likely to become affectively committed to the organization (Aselage & Eisenberger, 2003; Meyer & Allen, 1997; Mowday, Porter, & Steers, 1982), demonstrate a stronger loyalty to it (Coyle-Shapiro & Conway, 2005), and are less likely to leave the organization (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002).”
- The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers (2010, methodology): “Coyle-Shapiro and Conway (2005) conducted an exploratory factor analysis and found the three proposed dimensions (see also Coyle-Shapiro & Kessler, 2002; Rousseau, 1990).”
- How to Measure the Psychological Contract? A Critical Criteria-Based Review of Measures (2008, positive): “(2002), Ten Brink (2004), and Coyle-Shapiro and Conway (2005) found stronger relationships between employees’ experiences and employees’ attitudes in using actual experiences rather than using fulfilled promises.”
- Dynamics of psychological contracts with work engagement and turnover intention: The influence of organizational tenure (2013, methodology): “We measured employer fulfilment at T1 with the same 12-item scale from Coyle-Shapiro and Conway (2005). Respondents rated the extent to which their employer in reality had provided them with the 12 obligations mentioned earlier.”
- Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time (2016, background): “As a consequence, it is usually hard to distinguish the specific experience one is interested in from irrelevant or spurious others (see e.g., Coyle-Shapiro & Conway, 2005; Montes & Zweig, 2009, for examples).”
- When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors (2011, background): “…(e.g., Rousseau 1989, Van Dyne and Ang 1998), and perceived organizational support, or the employee's perception of support from the organization (e.g., Eisenberger et al. 2001, 1986; Wayne et al. 1997), are both founded on the norms of exchange and reciprocity (Coyle-Shapiro and Conway 2005).”
- Untangling Employee Loyalty: A Psychological Contract Perspective (2007, background): “…on the relationship between employee and employer, particularly with regard to constructs such as organizational citizenship behavior and perceived organizational support (e.g., Eisenberger et al. 1986; Shore and Tetrick 1991; Van Dyne, Graham, and Dienesch 1994; Coyle-Shapiro and Conway 2005).”
- Is Stereotype Threat a Useful Construct for Organizational Psychology Research and Practice? (2014, background): “The relationship that employees have with their employing organization (i.e., the psychological contract) has an impact on job attitudes, work motivation, well-being, and performance (Coyle-Shapiro & Conway, 2005; Robinson, Kraatz, & Rousseau, 1994).”