Career self-management: its nature, causes and consequences

By Zella King. 2004

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/deb3f4e8580833a4f6e173164b32b33ef555cff0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Relationship Between Career-Related Antecedents and Graduates’ Anticipatory Psychological Contracts (2009, background): “affects a wide range of outcomes, including career success and employee behaviors (e.g. King, 2004, Sturges et al., 2002).”
Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. (2006, background): “…employees as free agents who must be proactive in seeking out and participating in training and development opportunities in order to maintain internal and external marketability (Arthur & Rousseau, 1996; DeMeuse, Bergmann, & Lester, 2001; Hall, 1996a, 1996b; Hall & Mirvis, 1995; King, 2004).”
Relationship between protean career orientation and work–life balance: A resource perspective (2015, background): “As such, the establishment of career goals and strategies can help individuals develop human capital through the acquisition of greater experience, education, certifications, skills, and/or knowledge (Gould, 1979; Gould & Penley, 1984; King, 2004; Kossek, Roberts, Fisher, & DeMarr, 1998; Noe, 1996; ”
Crafting your Career: How Career Competencies Relate to Career Success via Job Crafting (2017, background): “…the boundaryless career perspective (“three ways of knowing”; Eby et al., 2003), the protean career perspective (“career metacompetencies”; Briscoe & Hall, 2006), the career self-management perspective (De Vos et al., 2009; King, 2004), and the human capital perspective (Kuijpers et al., 2006).”
#Trending topics in careers: a review and future research agenda (2017, background): “Dik and Duffy, 2009; Dobrow and Tosti-Kharas, 2011; Hall and Chandler, 2005), and proactive career behaviors (e.g. De Vos et al., 2009; King, 2004; Strauss et al., 2012).”
Career success: Constructing a multidimensional model (2008, background): “This is an interesting finding, as career anchors literature has mostly been linked to career management, decision-making and planning (King, 2004), but never explicitly to definitions of career success.”
Long work hours: a social identity perspective on meta‐analysis data (2008, result): “This finding is consistent with recent research which suggests that individuals are taking increasing personal responsibility for managing their own careers (King, 2004; Sullivan, Carden, & Martin, 1998).”
The career resources model: an integrative framework for career counsellors (2012, background): “For example, King (2004) and Raabe et al. (2007) describe career self-management in terms of specific behaviours.”
Organizational Support, Individual Attributes, and the Practice of Career Self-Management Behavior (2010, background): “…selfmanagement “by which individuals . . . engage in career strategies that increase the probability that career goals will be achieved” (Noe, 1996, p. 119), now acknowledged to be an important part of the career development process (e.g., King, 2004; Sturges, Conway, Guest, & Liefooghe, 2005).”
Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: a conceptual integration and extension (2007, background): “Career self-management, thus, starts to become the norm (King, 2004).”
Tales of the unexpected: Integrating career shocks in the contemporary careers literature (2018, unknown): “emphasis on topics such as career self-management (King, 2004), proactive career behaviours (De”
Plodders, pragmatists, visionaries and opportunists: career patterns and employability (2009, background): “These patterns reflected the extent to which individuals had adopted behaviours associated with career self-management and employability ( King, 2004”