Using Curriculum-Based Measurement to Predict Performance on State Assessments in Reading

By Margaret T. McGlinchey, Michael D. Hixson. 2004

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd382310b567e903387ece9418d49f5d1b9879b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Theodore J. Christ
2. John M. Hintze
3. C. Espin
4. E. Shapiro
5. A. Vanderheyden
6. Erica S. Lembke
7. Hilda Ives Wiley
8. T. Wallace

In Information Systems and Management

1. Milena A. Keller‐Margulis
2. E. Shapiro
3. John M. Hintze
4. Hilda Ives Wiley
5. Lynn S. Fuchs
6. David E. Wood
7. S. Deno
8. Theodore J. Christ

Citations in the corpus

• The Past, Present, and Future of Curriculum-Based Measurement Research (2004, background): “Three (Ardoin et al., 2004; Clarke & Shinn, 2004; McGlinchey & Hixson, 2004) focused on the first CBM research stage, where technical features of the static score (at one point in time) are examined.”
• Estimates of the Standard Error of Measurement for Curriculum-Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency (2007, background): “Although the mean levels of performances are not necessarily relevant to calculations of SEM, they demonstrate that the aggregated data set did approximate the expected trends of normative development across grades (cf. Good et al., 2001; McGlinchey & Hixson, 2004; Stage & Jacobsen, 2001).”
• Creating a Progress–Monitoring System in Reading for Middle–School Students: Tracking Progress toward Meeting High–Stakes Standards (2010, result): “Specific to the present study, both reading-aloud (Crawford, Tindal, & Stieber, 2001; Hintze & Silberglitt, 2005; McGlinchey & Hixson, 2004; Silberglitt & Hintze, 2005; Stage & Jacobsen, 2001) and maze-selection measures (Wiley & Deno, 2005) have been shown to predict performance on state standards…”
• Modeling the Relationship Between Oral Reading Fluency and Performance on a Statewide Reading Test (2006, background): “These results are consistent with previous studies demonstrating a significant relationship between oral reading fluency and reading achievement tests (Crawford et al., 2001; Fuchs et al., 2001; Good et al., 2001; McGlinchey & Hixson, 2004; Stage & Jacobsen, 2001).”
• Literature Synthesis on Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading (2007, background): “…and performance on state standards tests reported diagnostic efficiency statistics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power (Hintze & Silberglitt, 2005; McGlinchey & Hixson, 2004; Silberglitt & Hintze, 2005; Stage & Jacobsen, 2001; see Note 2).”
• Technical Adequacy of Response to Intervention Decisions (2011, methodology): “This recommendation has influenced the literature and a number of studies have been published subsequently using this approach (e.g., McGlinchey & Hixson, 2004).”
• Long-Term Diagnostic Accuracy of Curriculum-Based Measures in Reading and Mathematics (2008, result): “…ISSN 0279-6015 (ORF) and state achievement tests within the same year (Barger, 2003; Buck & Torgeson, 2003; Good, Simmons, & Kame’enui, 2001; McGlinchey & Hixon, 2004; Shapiro, Keller, Lutz, Edwards, & Hintze, 2006; Roehrig, Petscher, Nettles, Hudson, & Torgeson, 2008; Shaw & Shaw, 2002;…”
• Screening for At-Risk Readers in a Response to Intervention Framework (2007, background): “When all students are included, classification accuracy is harder to achieve with an ORF screen (e.g., McGlinchey & Hixson, 2004; Stage & Jacobsen, 2001).”
• Oral Reading and Maze Measures as Predictors of Success for English Learners on a State Standards Assessment (2005, background): “Most recently, McGlinchey and Hixon (2004) reported on the utility of the CBM oral reading measure for predicting performance on the Michigan Educational Assessment Profile (MEAP). In an analysis similar to that conducted by Stage and Jacobsen (2001) in Washington, McGlinchey and Hixon were able to ”
• A Longitudinal Examination of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Validity of R-CBM and High-Stakes Testing (2005, background): “Likewise, McGlinchey and Hixson (2004) found a high degree of association between R-CBM and performance on the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP).”