Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks

By Lisa Abrams, Rob Cross, Eric L. Lesser, Daniel Z. Levin. 2003

751 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d152a4ca18d54e41222baa71182812b60bd1cdbc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Respectful leadership and followers’ knowledge sharing: A social mindfulness lens (2020, background): “Indeed, research has indicated that many organizational members do not share knowledge because they are not aware that the knowledge they possess may be helpful for their colleagues (Abrams et al., 2003).”
Cultural differences, convergence, and crossvergence as explanations of knowledge transfer in international acquisitions (2010, result): “As explained above, this is a key issue, as trust has been linked to positive knowledge transfer outcomes in previous studies (Abrams et al., 2003; Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998).”
Why and when do people hide knowledge? (2013, background): “…to knowledge sharing have been identified (Wang and Noe, 2010), including the influence of organizational culture (e.g. Davenport et al., 1998), management support (e.g. King and Marks, 2008), rewards and incentives (e.g. Yao et al., 2007), and interpersonal trust (e.g. Abrams et al., 2003).”
The Relationship between Interpersonal Trust, Employee Satisfaction, and Employee Loyalty (2006, background): “Abrams et al. (2003) provide a comprehensive framework to identify the drivers of trust and to derive managerial implications.”
How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work (2009, background): “People must trust that the person they gain the information from has sufficient expertise or credibility [1].”
The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication (2005, background): “It is unclear whether task-related, socially related, or either kind of messages will do. Both have been implicated in the literature (e.g., Abrams, Cross, Lesser, & Levin, 2003 ).”
Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing (2011, background): “Furthermore, Agreeableness contains the facet trust which has been related to knowledge sharing (Abrams, Cross, Lesser and Levin 2003 ).”
FROM THE HEAD AND THE HEART: LOCATING COGNITION- AND AFFECT-BASED TRUST IN MANAGERS' PROFESSIONAL NETWORKS (2008, background): “These benefits of trust are frequently invoked in network theorizing to account for network effects on important managerial outcomes such as job mobility (Podolny & Baron, 1997), job satisfaction (Helliwell, 2005), and knowledge sharing (e.g., Abrams, Cross, Lesser, & Levin, 2003 ).”
Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing (2006, background): “One individual level factor which ameliorates knowledge sharing is interpersonal trust in the workplace (e.g. Abrams et al., 2003; Levin et al., 2006; McEvily et al., 2003; Mayer et al., 1995).”