Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: Conceptual background, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models.

By Alexander D. Stajkovic, Fred Luthans. 2003

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc16ef490b4dff21b2b0555c4ce8fbc7fb238458

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Insect Science

Citations in the corpus

From pay to praise? Non-cash employee recognition in Canadian and Australian firms (2010, background): “1153) and a recent meta-analysis shows that money can motivate employee performance (Stajkovic and Luthans 2003 ), the popularization of cognitive evaluation theory by Kohn and others has no doubt been a major impetus to the search by firms for alternative means of motivating employee behaviour.”
Competitive intelligence collection and use by sales and service representatives: how managers’ recognition and autonomy moderate individual performance (2015, background): “Building on Bandura’s (1986) social cognition theory, Stajkovic and Luthans (2001, 2003) propose that recognition impacts behavior via three dimensions.”
The Effects of Top Management Team Pay and Firm Internationalization on MNC Performance (2004, background): “…those inherent in long-term compensation, should promote the cooperation (an important covariate and behavioral underpinning of information-processing capacity;Pinto, Pinto & Prescott, 1993; Stajkovic & Luthans, 2003; Tsai, 2002) that is needed to insure firm performance across diverse markets.”
Anticipated verbal feedback induces altruistic behavior (2008, background): “Although the applied psychology literature has found significant effects of symbolic rewards in the workplace and in schools (Henderlong and Lepper 2002; Stajkovic and Luthans 2003), such studies suffer from the problem that symbolic rewards may be correlated with subsequent material rewards.”
Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment (2016, background): “Stajkovic and Luthans (2003) give an overview of ﬁeld-experimental studies and report strong positive effects of recognition on employees’ performance in a variety of workplace contexts.”
Impact of Reward and Recognition on Job Satisfaction and Motivation (2015, background): “Numerous empirical researches confirm that social recognition has significant positive effects on employee performance (Stajkovic and Luthans, 2003).”
A Tale of Two Paradigms: The Impact of Psychological Capital and Reinforcing Feedback on Problem Solving and Innovation (2011, neutral): “…improvement (See Stajkovic & Luthans, 1997 for a comprehensive review and meta-analysis and also see published studies over the years such as Luthans, Fox, & Davis, 1991; Luthans, Paul, & Baker, 1981; Luthans, Rhee, Luthans, & Avey, 2008; Peterson & Luthans, 2006; Stajkovic & Luthans, 2001, 2003).”
Do you get what you pay for? Sales incentives and implications for motivation and changes in turnover intention and work effort (2016, background): “…motivational effects, and there is meta-analytical evidence for a positive relation between individual variable PFP and performance quantity (Jenkins et al. 1998), performance on simple tasks (Stajkovic and Luthans 2003), and performance on uninteresting laboratory tasks (Weibel et al. 2010).”
Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory (2014, background): “The fourth factor is outcome monitoring, which entails leader provision of performance-enhancing seen as useful if given in a positive way and is learning-focused (Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998, 2003).”