Giving and receiving social support at work: The roles of personality and reciprocity.
By N. Bowling, T. Beehr, William M. Swader. 2005
253 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b52673b362f355cbe42957d3d20bca67f0f6849d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Gene M. Alarcon
- Daniela Gutermann
- Birgit Renzl
- S. Voelpel ‡
- Kurt Matzler
- Kevin J. Eschleman
- Todd A. Mooradian
- N. Bowling
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Birgit Renzl
- Kevin J. Eschleman
- Gene M. Alarcon
- Anika Deinert
- Daniela Gutermann
- S. Voelpel ‡
- R. Ferguson
- Kurt Matzler
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kurt Matzler
- Birgit Renzl
- Gene M. Alarcon
- Kevin J. Eschleman
- S. Voelpel ‡
- Todd A. Mooradian
- N. Bowling
- Astrid C. Homan
Citations in the corpus
- Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing (2006, background): “, 1998) and such behaviors as the giving and receiving of non-job and workrelated social support (Bowling et al., 2005), lower workplace deviance (i.”
- Customer sociability and the total service experience (2010, background): “, 2005), and to giving and receiving social support (Bowling et al., 2005).”
- Transformational leadership sub-dimensions and their link to leaders' personality and performance (2015, background): “…agreeableness indirectly affects leader performance via individualized consideration (a behavior that is likely to be positively influenced by agreeableness; Bowling et al., 2005), but not via intellectual stimulation (a behavior that agreeableness is less likely to promote; Graziano et al., 1996).”
- Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis (2009, background): “Extraverts, for example, may generally experience positive social environments at work, because they often evoke positive responses from their co-workers (Bowling, Beehr, & Swader, 2005 ).”