The phenomenology of fit: linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit.
By J. Edwards, Daniel M. Cable, Ian O. Williamson, Lisa Schurer Lambert, Abbie J. Shipp. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006
638 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1788721b96c01a9735eda0de1c31cffa58ed8d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- N. Bellé
- Amy Kristof‐Brown
- J. Diefendorff
- G. J. Greguras
- Jon Billsberry
- Khawaja Jehanzeb
- Wongun Goo
- Christina M. Moran
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- N. Bellé
- Murray R. Barrick
- Wongun Goo
- Christina M. Moran
- Bret Bradley
- Amy Kristof‐Brown
- Amy E. Colbert
- Neal Schmitt
In Sociology and Political Science
- Allison S. Gabriel
- N. Bellé
- P. Leisink
- G. J. Greguras
- N. V. van Loon
- J. Edwards
- J. Diefendorff
- Lisa Schurer Lambert
Citations in the corpus
- ADHD-like behavior and entrepreneurial intentions (2013, background): “This can be partly explained by their high need for independence and their risk tolerance.”
- Perceived fit with an academic environment: Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes (2008, background): “Because perceptions of the person and environment have shown weak relationships between actual measures of the person and environment (Edwards et al., 2006, pp. 822–823 ), it follows that various operationalizations of fit are found to be only moderately correlated, which suggests that other forms…”
- 4 Person–Environment Fit in Organizations: An Assessment of Theoretical Progress (2008, background): “Available evidence indicates that relationships linking the perceived person and environment to judgments of P–E fit contradict the theoretical logic that presumably ties them together (Edwards, Cable, Williamson, Lambert, & Shipp, 2006 ).”
- Examining Follower Responses to Transformational Leadership from a Dynamic, Person–Environment Fit Perspective (2017, positive): “…5 “ hardly any ” to 7 5 “ a great amount ” to answer two questions about each behavior: how much their supervisor had used the behavior that day (leadership received) and how much of the behavior would have been adequate (leadership needed) (see Edwards, Cable, Williamson, Lambert, & Shipp, 2006).”