Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.

By John Antonakis, Bruce J. Avolio, N. Sivasubramaniam. 2003

1,661 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab7d6b49ca750c6444c67f8befbdc6b8d24b4615

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Leadership Styles and Burnout: is there an association? (2010, methodology): “Finally, passive/avoidance behavior is measured by management by exception (passive), which refers to the leaders reactive actions after problems become serious, and laissez-faire behavior, which refers to the leader’s absence from any decision making process and involvement in organizational functi”
Servant Leadership Behaviour Scale: A hierarchical model and test of construct validity (2011, methodology): “In a validation study of the nine-factor full-range model of transformational leadership, Antonakis, Avolio, and Sivasubramaniam (2003) found that the measure was found to be stable only in homogenous contexts.”
Considering context in psychological leadership research (2009, background): “In studying how the full-range leadership model is contextually sensitive, Antonakis et al. (2003) examined the covariation of leadership styles of a multifactor theory across various contexts.”
The relationship between transformational leadership, perceived leader effectiveness and teachers’ job satisfaction (2014, background): “Research on transformational leadership has provided conflicting evidence on the factor structure of the “full-range leadership model” (Antonakis et al., 2003; Rafferty and Griffin, 2004).”
Researching the Trainability of Transformational Organizational Leadership (2005, background): “Antonakis et al. (2003) have established that themore heterogeneous the cohort, the clearer the factor structure and the relationshipwith dependent variables.”
Transformational leadership and job satisfaction: the moderating effect of contingent reward (2018, background): “The MLQ-5X scale is a standardized instrument whose validity and reliability have been found to be within acceptable range by many researchers (Antonakis et al., 2003; Avolio et al., 1999; Lowe et al., 1996).”
Charismatic leadership, change and innovation in an R&D organization (2009, background): “According to Antonakis et al. (2003), charismatic leadership consists of idealized influence, which refers to the socialized charisma of the leader; and idealized behaviours, which refers to the charismatic actions of the leader.”
Relationship between leadership behaviors and performance: The moderating role of a work team's level of age, gender, and cultural heterogeneity (2011, background): “This gap in the literature calls for research on the important area of the contextual dimensions of organizational processes such as leadership ( Antonakis et al. , 2003”
Leadership effects on innovation propensity: A two-factor full range leadership model (2013, methodology): “Despite variation and debate on the factor structure of the FRL model, the literature suggests significant support for the predictive validity of the model using both objective and subjective measures of performance (Antonakis et al., 2003; Naranjo-Valencia, Jiménez-Jiménez, & Sanz-Valle, 2011).”
Linking transformational leadership and work outcomes in temporary organizations: A social identity approach (2017, background): “…of the underlying mechanisms of the transformational leadership process, most of this research is conducted within permanent organizational structures and therefore rests on the assumption that leader-follower constellations are stable and continuous (Antonakis et al., 2003; Shamir, 2011).”
A meso measure? Examination of the levels of analysis of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ)☆ (2009, background): “There have been a number of studies and critiques of the psychometric properties of theMLQ (e.g., Antonakis et al., 2003; Tejeda, Scandura, & Pillai, 2001; Tepper & Percy, 1994).”