A meso measure? Examination of the levels of analysis of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ)☆
By C. Schriesheim, Joshua B. Wu, T. Scandura. 2009
121 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fa7e2ee69bdfb2b4f0cbba0d7c1abc624095c01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Herman H. M. Tse
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
- March L. To
- Y. Xi
- Yufan Shang
- R. Humphrey
- Alana Dorris
- Ashlea Troth
Citations in the corpus
- A multilevel model of transformational leadership, affect, and creative process behavior in work teams (2015, background): “As Schriesheim, Wu, and Scandura (2009) argue, however, the level of analysis of most Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire items is ambiguous because they do not have a clear referent target (e.g., “Expresses confidence that goals will be achieved”).”
- Differentiated transformational leadership and knowledge sharing: A cross-level investigation (2014, result): “…these propositions, follow-up studies by several leadership scholars provided empirical support and confirmed the notion that transformational leadership was flexible as a level of analysis (e.g., Schriesheim et al., 2009; Tse & Chiu, 2012; Wang & Howell, 2012; Wu et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013).”
- A Multilevel Investigation of Leadership and Turnover Behavior (2015, unknown): “We used a referent-shift consensus composition approach to modify the original scale items (Chan, 1998; Schriesheim et al., 2009).”