Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?

338 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A qualitative meta-analysis of trust in supervisor-subordinate relationships (2015, background): “Similarly, little attention has been given to more rational organisational theories such as stewardship (Davis et al., 1997) or stakeholder theory (Pirson and Malhotra, 2011).”
Family Firm Reputation and Humanization: Consumers and the Trust Advantage of Family Firms Under Different Conditions of Brand Familiarity (2018, background): “In line with trust literature, we further argue that as benevolence becomes more important over time (Pirson & Malhotra, 2011; Schoorman et al., 2007), the link between benevolence and brand trust might even increase in the context of real corporate brands that are ex-ante known by consumers…”
Revisiting Who, When, and Why Stakeholders Matter: Trust and Stakeholder Connectedness (2020, background): “When interviewing stakeholders about trust in business, Pirson and Malhotra (2011) found a number of references to organizational transparency.”
Idiosyncratic Deals and Voice Behavior (2015, background): “Therefore, compared to organizational commitment and organizational identification, organizational trust represents a stronger form of reciprocation (Colquitt & Rodell, 2011; Pirson & Malhotra, 2011).”
Stakeholder Relationship Bonds (2016, neutral): “However, a relationship is more than the sum of interactions (Hinde, 1999; Pirson and Malhotra, 2011).”