A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding?
By Lisa M. Blank. 2000
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7568177cfd4336562beb94523c1d0369308e7b8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Bracha Kramarski
- T. Michalsky
- S. Nashon
- David Anderson
- David H. Palmer
- P. Georghiades
- Gregory P. Thomas
- Kendall Hartley
In Education
- Bracha Kramarski
- T. Michalsky
- S. Nashon
- David Anderson
- P. Georghiades
- Gregory P. Thomas
- Kendall Hartley
- Ozgul Yilmaz-Tuzun
Citations in the corpus
- From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition (2004, result): “The former outcome is one that verifies the findings of Blank (2000) who offered teachers and students formal opportunities to talk about their science ideas, and reported that students who practised metacognition experienced more permanent restructuring of their understandings of ecology.”
- Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs About Science Teaching (2008, methodology): “The learning cycle is accepted as one of the best way to implement inquiry teaching (Blank 2000; Karplus and Their 1967; Lawson 1995).”
- Investigating Preservice Teachers' Professional Growth in Self-Regulated Learning Environments. (2009, background): “Many researchers of e-learning (e.g., Azevedo & Cromley, 2004; Blank, 2000; Hannum, 2001; Kramarski & Mizrachi, 2006; Michalsky, Zion, & Mevarech, 2007) found that learners of all ages fail to apply relevant prior knowledge in such an environment.”
- A Motivational View of Constructivist‐informed Teaching (2005, background): “Hewson et al. (1999) reported a number of studies showing that elicitation of students’ views can be effected by using tasks such as preinstructional quizzes, interviews, group posters, questions, and concept mapping.”
- Development of an Instrument Designed to Investigate Elements of Science Students’ Metacognition, Self‐Efficacy and Learning Processes: The SEMLI‐S (2008, background): “This issue is evident within the science education literature where metacognition has been defined as, for example, knowledge, control and awareness of learning processes (Baird, 1990 ; Thomas & McRobbie, 2001 ) and the ability to think about one’s thinking (Gilbert, 2005 ), with Blank ( 2000 ) p”
- The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. (2007, background): “It is usually associated with learners’ knowledge, awareness, and control of the processes by which they learn (Brown 1987; Garner & Alexander 1989) and the metacognitive learner is believed to be characterized by ability to recognize, evaluate, and where needed reconstruct existing ideas (Blank, 20”
- Enhancement of Metacognition Use and Awareness by Means of a Collaborative Intervention (2011, background): “It is not surprising then that over the past decades, interest in instructional enhancement of metacognition use has surged (Blank & Hewson, 2000; Davidowitz & Rollnick, 2003; Desoete, Roeyers, & De Clercq, 2003; Georghiades, 2004), including the use of specific strategies in chemistry (Francisco &…”
- Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning (2006, background): “A second example of strategy instruction is the use of prompted reflection through the use of questions (Blank, 2000; Chinn & Brown, 2002; Osman & Hannafin, 2001).”