Integrity and Leadership:: Clearing the Conceptual Confusion
By Michael E. Palanski, Francis J. Yammarino. 2007
353 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b1e863c42fba330aa39f70fb2e3d97ef9a3b0a3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Gordon Wang
- Rick D. Hackett
- Mary B. Mawritz
- David Bauman
- H. Leroy
- A. Engelbrecht
- B. Mahembe
- Gardielle Heine
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Rick D. Hackett
- Gordon Wang
- Susanne Braun
- Michael E. Palanski
- Mary B. Mawritz
- H. Leroy
- David Bauman
- Rebecca L. Greenbaum
Citations in the corpus
- Authentic Leadership: An Empirical Test of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Mechanisms (2011, background): “Parallel to the argument set forth by Palanski and Yammarino (2007) that a gross lack of fairness may override any positive effects of integrity, one could argue—and empirically test the proposition—that a violation of moral values may override any positive effects of relational transparency or…”
- Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure (2011, neutral): “Integrity behaviors are described as word-deed alignment or the extent to which what one says is in line with what one does (e.g., Dineen, Lewicki, & Tomlinson, 2006; Palanski & Yammarino, 2007, 2009).”
- When Leaders Fail to “Walk the Talk” (2015, background): “A number of scholars have noted the similarities between these two constructs and leader hypocrisy/integrity (Palanski & Yammarino, 2007; Simons, 2002; Simons et al., 2007).1 In their validation of a supervisor behavioral integrity scale, Simons et al. (2007) concluded that supervisor behavioral…”
- Relationships Among Employee Perception of Their Manager’s Behavioral Integrity, Moral Distress, and Employee Attitudes and Well-Being (2013, background): “There are various definitions and meanings given to the term BI in the literature (Palanski and Yammarino 2007).”
- Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework (2009, background): “Palanski & Yammarino (2007) provide a comprehensive review of the integrity and leadership literature and suggest an operational definition.”
- Conceptualization and Measurement of Virtuous Leadership: Doing Well by Doing Good (2016, background): “Virtuous Leadership: Concept, Theory and Distinctions Along with a resurgence of virtue ethics as a framework for business ethics (Crossan et al., 2013; Flynn, 2008; Palanski and Yammarino, 2007), there has been increasing research interest in”
- Leadership and the three faces of integrity (2013, background): “They group the most common usages of integrity under five headings: wholeness, consistency of words and actions, consistency in adversity, being true to oneself, and ethical behavior (Palanski & Yammarino, 2007).”
- From inconsistency to hypocrisy: When does “saying one thing but doing another” invite condemnation? (2018, background): “Also, despite some colloquial and scholarly understandings of the term integrity as central to ethics (Becker, 1998; Mayer et al., 1995; see Palanski & Yammarino, 2007), behavioral integrity – like worddeed misalignment – is neither inherently moral or immoral (Simons, 2002).”
- Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement (2017, methodology): “It is clear from Figure 1 that integrity would be a significant driving force for a person to engage in ethical leadership in an attempt to influence followers (Brown et al., 2005; Kalshoven et al., 2011; Mayer et al., 2012; Palanski and Yammarino, 2007).”