The Etiology of the Multilevel Paradigm in Management Research

By John E. Mathieu, Gilad Chen. 2011

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7dfd405ccb195a0190d1da46406c1c5ab55810d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Implementing Performance Appraisal: Exploring the Employee Experience (2013, methodology): “However, this limitation is partly overcome by the items used to measure this variable being worded at the group level (i.e., with senior management as the point of reference—see Mathieu & Chen, 2011).”
Multilevel Research in the Field of Organizational Behavior (2013, background): “Rousseau (1985) and Mathieu and Chen (2011) highlighted three fundamental aspects to multilevel research that must be aligned, to avoid level-related confusions or errors: the level of theory, the level of measurement, and the level of analysis.”
Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness. (2012, background): “Multilevel scholars (e.g., Kozlowski & Klein, 2000; Mathieu & Chen, 2011) have suggested that individual‐level models are often too simplistic to accurately capture organizational phenomena.”
Empowerment—Fad or Fab? A Multilevel Review of the Past Two Decades of Research (2012, background): “However, future research should extend this framework by advancing theories as to the relative salience of variables from different levels of analysis and introduce more integrated models of the combined and interactive influences (Mathieu & Chen, 2011).”
Strategic agility-driven business model renewal: the case of an SME (2017, background): “Qualitative approaches are suitable for longitudinal process analyses for issues between individuals (micro) and firms (macro) (Mathieu and Chen, 2011).”
The Application of the Multilevel Paradigm in Human Resource Management–Outcomes Research: Taking Stock and Going Forward (2019, background): “…from a single-level to a multilevel perspective has major implications for theory, measurement, and analysis (Kozlowski & Klein, 2000) and is therefore commonly thought to represent a fundamental paradigm shift in management research (Hitt, Beamish, Jackson, & Mathieu, 2007; Mathieu & Chen, 2010).”
Psychological capital: A review and synthesis (2014, background): “(2011) and Rego et al. (2012c) found that PsyCap was positively related to creative performance and Luthans et al.”
I get by with a little help from my supervisor: Creative-idea generation, idea implementation, and perceived supervisor support (2014, unknown): “Even though we drew from both bodies of literature, a further multilevel approach (cf. Mathieu & Chen, 2011) and more complex research designs would be useful.”
Microfoundations in international management research: The case of knowledge sharing in multinational corporations (2019, background): “…it is not, as when studies ‘‘cumulatively’’ measure, for example, knowledge sharing at a level that is out of sync with the level at which knowledge sharing takes place in actuality (see also Mathieu and Chen 2011 for an extensive discussion of the ambiguity surrounding the unit of inquiry).”
Dispersion-Composition Models in Multilevel Research (2011, background): “Thus, along with Mathieu and Chen (2011), we believe the process by which researchers identify an appropriate unit of analysis is oftentimes underdiscussed in published reports.”
A Meta-Analysis of Different Forms of Shared Leadership–Team Performance Relations (2016, methodology): “Social network approaches (i.e., sociometric approach) are akin to configural constructs or compilational models, which do not assume a convergence of attitudes but, rather, embrace discontinuity and a complex nonlinear emergence of constructs (Mathieu & Chen, 2011).”