Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions
By Mogens Agervold *, E. G. Mikkelsen. 2004
419 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6178ff2167d2e0d6ad86a1a6e96e67f754a3c519
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Staale Einarsen
- Hans De Witte
- G. Notelaers
- Evangelia Demerouti
- A. Skogstad
- Sharon K. Parker
In Social Psychology
- Staale Einarsen
- G. Notelaers
- Hans De Witte
- A. Skogstad
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Maureen Dollard
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Elfi Baillien
In Sociology and Political Science
- Staale Einarsen
- A. Skogstad
- G. Notelaers
- Hans De Witte
- Parbudyal Singh
- Al-Karim Samnani
- Elfi Baillien
- Dieter Zapf
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Efficacy and Workaholism as Initiators of the Job Demands-Resources Model. (2012, methodology): “Influence and participation was assessed by using a three-item scale (Agervold and Mikkelsen, 2004; Italian version: Guglielmi et al., 2011).”
- Cross-lagged relationships between workplace bullying, job satisfaction and engagement: Two longitudinal studies (2009, background): “However, quite a few “other” antecedents of well-being have been identified as antecedents of bullying, such as workload and autonomy (Agervold & Mikkelsen, 2004 ; De Cuyper, Baillien, & De Witte, in press ; Hauge et al, 2007 ; Hoel & Salin, 2003 ).”
- Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective. (2009, background): “Bullying has been found to be higher when work is uninteresting and has low variability (Einarsen et al. 1994, Vartia 1996) or lacks meaning (Agervold & Mikkelsen 2004).”
- A job characteristics approach to explain workplace bullying (2010, background): “Except for some studies on such antecedents (e.g., Agervold & Mikkelsen, 2004; Hauge, Skogstad, & Einarsen, 2007), the perspective in the literature has shifted towards the organizational responsibility to cope with changes in the global market (e.g., Hoel, Zapf, & Cooper, 2002; McCarthy, 1996).”
- Workplace bullying: The role of psychosocial work environment factors. (2009, background): “affected by exposure to bullying), Agervold and Mikkelsen (2004) found that”
- Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study (2007, background): “…approach, some studies only report on differences between bullied and non-bullied employees as regards perceptions of their work environment (e.g., Agervold & Mikkelsen, 2004; Jennifer, Cowie, & Ananiadou, 2003), while others report correlations between different work characteristics and exposure…”
- Primary Principals' Leadership Styles, School Organizational Health and Workplace Bullying. (2011, background): “The topic of workplace bullying has attracted increasing attention during the past ten to 15 years ( Agervold and Mikkelsen, 2004, p. 336”
- Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach (2006, neutral): “Psychosomatic complaints (Agervold & Mikkelsen, 2004; Leymann & Gustafsson, 1996; Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2002; Zapf et al., 1996) and low sleep quality (Bjo¨rkqvist, Osterman, & Hjelt-Ba¨ck, 1994; Leymann & Gustafsson, 1996; Zapf et al., 1996) correlate substantially with exposure to workplace…”
- The relationship between workplace aggression and target deviant behaviour: The moderating roles of power and task interdependence (2012, background): “Further, though we focused exclusively on deviant responses, it would be interesting to investigate whether the relationship between perpetrators and victims influence other outcomes, such as stress and well-being (eg, Agervold & Mikkelsen, 2004 ), and reconciliation or forgiveness (Aquino, Tripp, ”
- A three-wave study of job resources, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Italian schoolteachers (2011, methodology): “Opportunities to learn and to develop were assessed with five items from the Psychosocial Work Environment and Stress Questionnaire (PWSQ; Agervold & Mikkelsen, 2004 ; Italian version: Guglielmi, Paplomatas, Simbula, & Depolo, 2009 ).”
- Why is Organizational Change Related to Workplace Bullying? Role Conflict and Job Insecurity as Mediators (2009, background): “Increased or high workload, moreover, appears to encourage bullying (e.g. Agervold and Mikkelsen, 2004; Appelberg et al., 1991; Einarsen and Raknes, 1997).”
- The role of the psychosocial safety climate in coping with workplace bullying: A grounded theory and sequential tree analysis (2016, background): “Bullied workers tend to report higher job demands, such as time pressure, haste, and workload (Hoel & Cooper, 2000; Vartia, 1996; Zapf, 1999), and lower job control (e.g., Agervold & Mikkelsen, 2004; Vartia, 1996; Zapf, 1999) relative to other workers.”
- Workplace Bullying: Considering the Interaction Between Individual and Work Environment (2015, background): “Employees who have high levels of role conflict and role ambiguity tend to experience greater confusion and espouse lower confidence in their actions (Agervold and Mikkelsen 2004).”