Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach
By G. Notelaers, Staale Einarsen, Hans De Witte, Jeroen K. Vermunt. 2006
263 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87799d3aff496e8707f0d399e79b217b82849db9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
- Staale Einarsen
- Hans De Witte
- Elfi Baillien
- A. Skogstad
- G. Notelaers
- Dieter Zapf
- M. B. Nielsen
- H. Hoel
In Social Psychology
- Staale Einarsen
- G. Notelaers
- M. B. Nielsen
- Hans De Witte
- Denise Salin
- H. Hoel
- A. Skogstad
- Elfi Baillien
In Sociology and Political Science
- Staale Einarsen
- G. Notelaers
- M. B. Nielsen
- Hans De Witte
- A. Skogstad
- Denise Salin
- Elfi Baillien
- H. Hoel
Citations in the corpus
- The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised in a representative sample (2013, background): “In particular, Notelaers et al. (2006) underlined that many, yet less frequent, negative behaviours may accumulate and lead to the experience of workplace bullying.”
- Why is Organizational Change Related to Workplace Bullying? Role Conflict and Job Insecurity as Mediators (2009, methodology): “The NAQ (Einarsen and Raknes, 1997), a well-known and well-established internationally validated scale, was used to measure exposure to bullying by means of selfreported exposure to specific bullying behaviours (Notelaers et al., 2006).”
- Do they stay or do they go (2011, methodology): “This approach is employed to investigate whether different homogeneous groups of respondents exist, regarding the nature and degree of their exposure to bullying ( Notelaers et al. , 2006”
- Cross-lagged relationships between workplace bullying, job satisfaction and engagement: Two longitudinal studies (2009, methodology): “providing sufficient information about the escalating process of bullying (Notelaers et al., 2006).”
- Workers' perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study (2011, result): “Furthermore, these results add weight to the distinction provided by several authors, between person-oriented acts (acts directed at the person and his or her personality and behaviours, eg, being ignored, ridiculed, or shouted at) and work-oriented acts (ie, indirect aggressive acts directed at the”
- The effect of exposure to bullying on turnover intentions: the role of perceived psychological contract violation and benevolent behaviour (2017, methodology): “In line with the previous research, this article clearly demonstrates that bullying is associated with higher turnover intentions (e.g. Bowling & Beehr, 2006; Hauge et al., 2010; Notelaers et al., 2006).”
- Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Comparisons across time and estimation methods (2009, background): “Some studies have also used latent class cluster modelling (LCC; see Magidson & Vermunt, 2002 , 2004 ) to estimate prevalence of bullying by empirically testing whether different groups of respondents exist based on their probability for exposure to the specified negative behaviours in the utilize”
- Discouraging Bullying: The Role of Ethical Leadership and its Effects on the Work Environment (2010, background): “Research revealed that 4–15% of employees are a target of bullying (Notelaers et al., 2006) where in up to 80% of the cases, a superior is involved in the bullying or is the alleged bully (Einarsen et al., 2003).”
- Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (2009, methodology): “…(LCC) (Magidson & Vermunt, 2001, 2004) using Latent GOLD (Vermunt & Magidson, 2003) was conducted in order to investigate whether different homogeneous groups of respondents exist, and which might differ according to the nature and degree of their exposure to bullying (Notelaers et al., 2006).”