Feeling and Doing: Affective Influences on Interpersonal Behavior

By Joseph P. Forgas. 2002

403 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ed98d6faee7b01f68d92403908fe855700c8324

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Employee positive moods as a mediator linking transformational leadership and employee work outcomes (2009, background): “Forgas ( 2002 ) argued that people's positive moods would influence their interpersonal behavior (eg, helping coworkers, communicating, negotiating, and persuading others).”
Effects of Attribute Framing on Cognitive Processing and Evaluation (2004, background): “Positive mood has for instance been found to promote more flexible and creative thinking styles (Forgas, 2002a; Isen, 2002).”
An Integrative Model Linking Supervisor Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (2008, positive): “Therefore, this study contributes to the literature by further deepening the field’s existing knowledge of the complex roles that played by both job cognitions and affective states in shaping employees’ displayed OCB ( Forgas 2002 ).”
Moral identity centrality and cause-related marketing : the moderating effects of brand social responsibility image and emotional brand attachment (2016, background): “These emotions may prime positive memories and interactions concerning the brand (Forgas, 2002).”
Can negative affect eliminate the power of first impressions? Affective influences on primacy and recency effects in impression formation (2011, methodology): “51), confirming the predicted mood congruent bias in judgments (Forgas, 2002; Forgas &Bower, 1987).”
Olfaction, Emotion and Associative Learning: Effects on Motivated Behavior (2004, background): “Negative mood has also been shown to influence cognition and behavior though less consistently and predictably than positive affect (see Forgas, 2002; Gendolla, 2000; Russ, 1993, for reviews).”
Don’t Worry, Be Sad! On the Cognitive, Motivational, and Interpersonal Benefits of Negative Mood (2013, positive): “In other situations, positive affect may result in more confident negotiating strategies (Forgas, 2002) and more effective self-disclosure (Forgas, 2011a).”
The Importance of Being Emotional : How do Emotions Affect Entrepreneurial Opportunity Evaluation and Exploitation? (2010, background): “Forgas (2002a, 2002b) points out, that numerous studies provided empirical support for these predictions (e.g., Baron, 1987; Bower, 1991; Clark and Isen, 1982; Forgas and Bower, 1987; Isen, 1987; Sedikides, 1992, 1995).”
EXECUTIVE JOB DEMANDS: SUGGESTIONS FROM A STRESS AND DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE (2005, background): “The results have been so strong that they have begun to overwhelm the contrary view asserting that it is negative affect that focuses attention and improves decisions (Forgas, 2002; Schwartz & Bless, 1991).”
The Influence of Positive Affect on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Facilitating Enjoyment of Play, Responsible Work Behavior, and Self-Control (2005, background): “…suggestion contradicts the prevalent stereotype of positive affect as promoting simplified cognitive processing and a superficial, short-sighted approach to situations (e.g., Forgas, 1995, 2002; Schwarz & Bless, 1991; see also Aspinwall, 1998 and Isen, 1993, 2000, for discussions of this issue).”
Authentic Leadership Perception, Trust in the Leader, and Followers’ Emotions in Organizational Change Processes (2016, background): “…more spontaneous, emotion-based behavior, especially in uncertain and ambiguous contexts (e.g., organizational changes) or when they lack sufficient interest, motivation, or resources to create a more elaborate response (Bartunek, Balogun, & Do, 2011; Forgas, 1995, 2002; Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996).”
On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments (2003, background): “Schwarz & Clore, 1983; see also Forgas, 1995, 2002 ), and hence, particularly under these conditions, people may consult their existing affective state to infer their justice evaluations and make a judgment accordingly.”