On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: the mediating role of emotions (2008, background): “…and pride seemed highest whenever the outcome was favourable (for similar findings see Hegtvedt & Killian, 1999; Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000). van den Bos (2003) argued that it is not uncommon for people forming justice judgments to rely on how they feel about the events they have encountered.”
Justice, Fairness, and Employee Reactions (2015, background): “Van den Bos (2003) conducted two lab experiments to explore how affect and justice information interact to form fairness perceptions.”
Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. (2016, background): “For example, perhaps more distressed officers are more likely to judge their departments as unfair (see van den Bos, 2003).”
Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond (2011, background): “For example, participants’ judgments of justice in conditions of uncertainty (e.g., when there is no information about the others’ outcome) was influenced by irrelevant information (e.g., affect, Van den Bos, 2003; Van den Bos, Lind, Vermunt, & Wilke, 1997).”