The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema

By Susan Mohammed, R. Klimoski, J. Rentsch. 2000

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5874e4e47a8eb3468b46b247f5060057dabd2783

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. (2010, background): “The second underpinning of cognition that we examined was form of cognition (structured vs. perceptual; Mohammed et al., 2000; Rentsch et al., 2008).”
Concept Mapping as an Alternative Approach for the Analysis of Open-Ended Survey Responses (2002, background): “They have several strengths (see Ryan & Bernard [2000] and Mohammed, Klimoski, & Rentsch [2000] for a detailed discussion of different methods).”
Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries (2001, methodology): “team context (Mohammed et al., 2000).”
Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement (2001, background): “Second, there is great ambiguity and confusion regarding how to measure cognition in teams (Mohammed et al., 2000).”
Measuring Shared Team Mental Models: A Meta-Analysis (2010, methodology): “…describe the extent to which team members’ mental models are overlapping or similar (Cooke et al., 2007; Edwards, Day, Arthur, & Bell, 2006; Mohammed et al., 2000), to fit within the context of this meta-analysis, team cognition constructs examined within the primary studies must have…”
The effects of groups' variety and disparity on groups' cognitive complexity (2007, background): “Relevant concepts for the knowledge domain of the group (to be elicited by interview, document analysis, verbal protocol analysis—see for details Carley, 1993, 1997; Mohammed et al., 2000) are to be written on independent cards, and then the group members are instructed to organize them in a way tha”
How Influential Are Mental Models on Interaction Performance? Exploring the Gap between Users' and Designers' Mental Models through a New Quantitative Method (2017, methodology): “, the Pathfinder technique) to calculate the similarity score [26, 45, 46].”
An Analytical Framework of Social Learning Facilitated by Participatory Methods (2014, methodology): “In organizational research this content of a mental model is referred to as the team member mental model (Mohammed et al. 2000).”
Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. (2003, methodology): “Agreement indices are commonly used in team mental model research (Mohammed et al., 2000).”
How Does Leader Humility Influence Team Performance? Exploring the Mechanisms of Contagion and Collective Promotion Focus (2016, unknown): “…the unique skills and abilities of team members could optimize team performance, because, when team members understand how they fit with the team (Kozlowski, Gully, Nason, & Smith, 1999; Mohammed, Klimoski, & Rentsch, 2000), the team performs better (Lorinkova, Pearsall, & Sims, 2013).”
Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives? (2007, background): “Therefore, according to Mohammed, Klimoski, and Rentsch (2000), we distinguish between two ways for measuring group-level cognitive structures.”