Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement

By J. Rentsch, R. Klimoski. 2001

559 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bce47ad9cdcc506e5e536118e8e8b19f88f17380

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance (2011, background): “For example, variables that have been related to shared mental models may be of influence here, such as team size or team experience (Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001).”
Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. (2003, background): “The direct approach outlined in this article offers a clear link between transactive memory research and recent field research on team mental models (Cannon-Bowers & Salas, 1998; Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001 ).”
Entrepreneurial Team Cognition: A Review (2015, unknown): “In this perspective, sharing refers to complementarity and points to ‘the extent to which team members’ cognitions are complementary in structure and/or content fitting together like puzzle pieces’ (Rentsch and Klimoski 2001; Rentsch et al. 2009, p. 145).”
Diversity in social context: a multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance (2004, background): “The dimensions of demographic diversity that have been associated with improved team performance include gender (Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001), ethnicity ( Watson et al., 1993), age (Kilduff, Angelmar, & Mehra, 2000), occupational background (e.g., Barsade, Ward, Turner, & Sonnenfeld, 2000; Bantel &…”
The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. (2010, background): “Prior work has identified antecedents like cross training (Marks et al., 2001), team demography (Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001), and leader behavior (DeChurch, 2003) that may be profitable springboards for future research.”
The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria (2006, background): “…criterion on the rwg index (again, usually .70; e.g., Bass et al., 2003; Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, & Schaufeli, 2001), and still others have aggregated data only for those groups that reach some cutoff criterion (Aryee, Chen, & Budhwar, 2004; Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001; Susskind et al., 2003).”
Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy (2006, methodology): “Similarly, researchers have little explored the antecedents of team mental model similarity and accuracy (see Marks et al., 2000 and Rentsch & Klimoski, 2001 for exceptions).”
High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Internal Social Structure (2005, background): “For instance, Rentsch and Klimoski (2001) found that allowing individuals to participate in the selection process by choosing their own team members is positively related to SMMs.”
6 Three Perspectives on Team Learning: Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, and Group Process (2007, background): “Rentsch and Klimoski (2001) likewise proposed that schema agreement, or sharedness, is critical for task performance.”
A multilevel analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work (2008, unknown): “…for employees’ length of work experience with team members and their interaction frequency with other team members because these variables may potentially explain team outcomes, Interpersonal Exchange Relationships 19 such as TMX (Rentsch & Klimoski, 2002; Pelled, Eisenhardt, & Xin, 1999).”