NEWCOMERS' RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK TIES DURING SOCIALIZATION
By E. W. Morrison. 2002
994 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3215ab9f321be8580daf2b3fd4092f90ff862a58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- M. Shaffer
- Maria L. Kraimer
- Bjoern Sebastian Reiche
- David A. Harrison
- Mo Wang
- Suzanne C de Janasz
- B. Erdogan
- T. Bauer
In Sociology and Political Science
- Sharon K. Parker
- Alicia A. Grandey
- Adam M. Grant
- Markus Groth
- Mo Wang
- Peter Totterdell
- Junqi Shi
- David Holman
Citations in the corpus
- Social networks and employee voice: The influence of team members' and team leaders' social network positions on employee voice (2016, background): “…calculate the betweenness centrality, each employee was asked, ‘‘Which of the following persons do you interact with as part of your routine work role (i.e., in terms of those who provide you with work inputs, or to whom you provide your work outputs)?” about all other teammembers (Morrison, 2002).”
- The dynamics of proactivity at work (2008, background): “Similarly, in the SNB literature, researchers have observed that employees vary in how frequently they seek to build social networks (Morrison, 2002).”
- BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS (2010, background): “…of behaviors and values (Goffman, 1961), but especially so for novel hybrid startups which have no access to “ready-to-wear” socialization processes and systems (Wolfe Morrison, 2002) and in the absence of already socialized insiders or recruits with a “ready-to-wear” job experience (Adkins, 1995).”
- Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration Versus Exploitation in Team Design (2006, background): “Empirical evidence shows that the distinction between newcomer and old-timer matters at both the team and the organization level and is relevant for organizational socialization, group interactions, and group effectiveness (Moreland & Levine, 1989; Morrison, 2002).”
- Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences (2006, background): “Thus, this section follows Naylor’s (1984) original and Highhouse’s (2001) renewed call for further integration and ‘‘cross-fertilization’’ (Highhouse, 2001, p.”
- Relationships at Work: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Dyadic Work Relationships (2009, background): “…is conceivable that individuals enter a work relationship with no prior information about each other, in most cases, information is transmitted formally or informally to each member regarding the norms, expectations, styles, and so forth regarding the new work relationship (e.g., Morrison, 2002).”
- The effects of early socialization experiences on content mastery and outcomes: A mediational approach (2006, methodology): “These relationships have all received prior empirical support (Kammeyer-Mueller & Wanberg, 2003; Morrison, 2002).”
- Reducing turnover intent: supervisor and co-worker incivility and socialization-related learning (2013, background): “Morrison (2002) found that having supervisors as opposed to just peers within newcomer’s informational network is significantly related to increased job and role learning.”
- Effective and sustained proactivity in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective (2014, background): “…2001), expand (Nicholson, 1984), and negotiate their tasks and roles (Ashford & Black, 1996); they actively build networks and relationships (Morrison, 2002); they seek out information to improve their job performance (Ashford, Blatt, & VandeWalle, 2003); and they develop their skills and…”
- The role of international assignees' social capital in creating inter-unit intellectual capital: A cross-level model (2009, result): “Although their study provides no evidence for structural social capital preceding cognitive social capital, this argument is supported by research on organizational socialization (e.g., Van Maanen and Schein, 1979; Morrison, 2002) that highlights the role of social interactions for the diffusion of ”
- How to win friendship and trust by influencing people’s feelings: An investigation of interpersonal affect regulation and the quality of relationships (2012, methodology): “Similar items have been successfully used in other social network studies (e.g. Levin and Cross, 2004; Morrison, 2002).”
- Friendship and Advice Networks in the Context of Changing Professional Values (2004, background): “Friendship has been linked with organizational commitment (Morrison, 2002), resource sharing during crisis (Krackhardt and Stern, 1988), and career-related decision making (Kilduff, 1990; Krackhardt, 1992).”
- Navigating Uncharted Waters (2015, background): “Morrison (2002) showed that characteristics of one’s social network in the form of network size, density, departmental diversity, and status were predictors of task mastery and role clarity.”
- Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: a study of managers' information gathering behaviors (2008, methodology): “' An upper limit of 12 was chosen both to limit respondent fatigue and because prior research suggested managers' networks generally include fewer than 12 ties (e.g., Carroll & Teo, 1996; Cross & Sproull, 2004; Morrison, 2002; Seibert et al., 2001).”