Predictors of exception word and nonword reading in dyslexic children: The severity hypothesis
By Yvonne Griffiths, M. Snowling. 2002
224 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c2d30ca749f4ab7c688b3e228ea83a5e1138bce
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- E. Geva
- Fataneh Farnia
- Tracy Packiam Alloway
- Susan E. Gathercole *
- J. Rose
- Marie-Line Bosse
- Sylviane Valdois
- F. Vellutino
In Education
- D. Scanlon
- F. Vellutino
- J. Rose
- Paul L. Morgan
- Jack M. Fletcher
- Marie-Line Bosse
- E. Geva
- George Farkas
In Statistics and Probability
- Tracy Packiam Alloway
- E. Geva
- J. Rose
- Marie-Line Bosse
- Sylviane Valdois
- Fataneh Farnia
- Susan E. Gathercole *
- F. Vellutino
Citations in the corpus
- Developmental dyslexia in adults : a research review (2004, unknown): “Empirical evidence suggests that it might be explained by insufficient exposure to print (Griffiths & Snowling, 2002; Gustafson, 2001; Sprenger-Charolles et al., 2000) and lower verbal ability (although not necessarily less potential for intellectual development).”
- Vocabulary Is Important for Some, but Not All Reading Skills (2007, unknown): “Despite the difficulty of interpreting exactly what measures of orthographic processing are tapping, it is the case that performance on both orthographic choice (e.g., Manis et al., 1996) and print exposure (Castles, Datta, Gayan, & Olson, 1999; Griffiths & Snowling, 2002 ) tasks predict exception ”
- Reading, Mathematics, and Behavioral Difficulties Interrelate: Evidence from a Cross-Lagged Panel Design and Population-Based Sample of US Upper Elementary Students (2013, background): “This in turn may reduce later reading skills growth, vocabulary, motivation, strategy use, and cognitive growth in the verbal domain (Echols, West, Stanovich, & Zehr, 1996; Griffiths & Snowling, 2002; Guthrie, Schafer, & Huang, 2001; Senechal, LeFevre, Hudson, & Lawson, 1996).”
- Is There a Bidirectional Relationship between Children's Reading Skills and Reading Motivation? (2007, unknown): “…vocabulary, verbal fluency, reading comprehension, and general knowledge (Cunningham & Stanovich, 1991; Echols, West, Stanovich, & Zehr, 1996; Griffiths & Snowling, 2002; Guthrie et al., 2001; Guthrie, Wigfield, Metsala, & Cox, 1999; Leppänen, Aunola, & Nurmi, 2005; Senechal, LeFevre,…”
- Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties : an independent report (2009, background): “29 For a review of the evidence on this, see Vellutino et al (2004), Hulme and Snowling (2009) 30 Snowling (2008a) 31 Snowling & Maughan (2006) 32 Griffiths and Snowling (2002), Stanovich et al (1997) 33 Snowling et al (2007)”
- Influence of the visual attention span on child reading performance: A cross-sectional study (2009, background): “It has been already pointed out that phonemic skills (and/or phonological recoding) are necessary but not sufficient to explain irregular word reading performance (Bowers, Golden, Kennedy, & Young, 1994; Griffiths & Snowling, 2002).”
- Cognitive correlates of vocabulary growth in English language learners (2011, background): “Some argue that PA and phonological short-term memory tap a common phonological element that is primarily responsible for phonological learning (e.g., Bowey, 2001; Griffiths & Snowling, 2002; Metsala, 1999).”
- The Role of Sentence Recall in Reading and Language Skills of Children with Learning Difficulties. (2005, background): “The present study 1041-6080/$ - doi:10.1016/j.l T Correspond E-mail add see front matter D 2005 Elsevier Inc.”
- Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? (2004, background): “Difficulties in acquiring phonological awareness and skill in alphabetic coding are believed to be due, in many cases, to weak phonological coding characterized by poorly specified phonological representations (Griffiths & Snowling, 2002).”