Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts

By N. Entwistle, H. Tait, Velda McCune. 2000

475 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a2805fdb159806ae857eac8ab1b9472509dcfc1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Does culture influence learning styles in higher education (2007, background): “Similarly, deep and surface apathetic approaches are not mutually exclusive; studies by Entwistle, Tait and McCune (2000) have confirmed the independence of these three approaches.”
Methodological Issues in Questionnaire-Based Research on Student Learning in Higher Education (2004, background): “These findings have, not unreasonably, motivated attempts to devise improved instruments in the form of revised versions of the ASI ( Entwistle et al., 2000; Tait and Entwistle, 1996) and the two-factor SPQ (Biggs et al., 2001).”
The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent (2017, result): “Plot of the learning approaches (Mean-split). previous studies (Biggs et al., 2001; Entwistle et al., 2000).”
University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice (2002, background): “Recent research has both con rmed this process of atypical variation (Entwistle et al. 2000) and identi ed presage factors such as a student’s prior knowledge of a subject area which may be associated with it (Prosser et al. 2000).”
Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity (2010, background): “Those approaches to writing may be related to deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning (Entwistle et al., 2000) and there was some evidence from student responses that focusing on approaches to academic writing may help to promote deeper approaches to learning.”
The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance (2004, background): “Surface approach is expected to be positively related to neuroticism reflecting the surface learners fear of failure motivation displayed by pessimism and anxiety about academic outcomes (Entwistle et al., 2000). We anticipate a strategic approach will be positively related to conscientiousness as a”
What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence? (2018, result): “The relation between unorganised studying and the surface approach has been found in several quantitative studies (e.g. Entwistle et al. 2000; Parpala et al. 2010).”
Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students’ Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement (2015, background): “…and the level of assessment feedback is adequate for supporting their efforts toward incorporating deep learning approaches (Cope & 168 R. B. Dull et al. Staehr, 2005; Entwistle et al., 2000; Entwistle & McCune, 2004; Entwistle & Smith, 2002; Gow et al., 1994; Trigwell & Prosser, 1991a, 1991b).”
Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (assist) using accounting students in the USA and Ireland: a research note (2004, background): “This cross loading is consistent with results reported elsewhere (Byrne et al., 1999; Entwistle et al., 2000; Diseth, 2001) and as noted by Entwistle et al. (2000, p. 37) it is ‘entirely understandable in conceptual terms’.”