THE IMPORTANCE OF ROLE AMBIGUITY AND TRUST IN CONFLICT PERCEPTION: UNPACKING THE TASK CONFLICT TO RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT LINKAGE

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Conflict Transformation (2008, background): “One of the potential reasons why task conflict may distract members from the task at hand and be detrimental for performance is its often high association with relationship conflict (e.g., DeChurch et al., 2007; Simons & Peterson, 2000; Tidd et al., 2004).”
Effects of conflict management strategies on perceptions of intragroup conflict. (2007, background): “Research has found both trust and role ambiguity qualify the task-relationship conflict linkage (Simons & Peterson, 2000; Tidd et al., 2004).”
It could be worse: a study on the alleviating roles of trust and connectedness in intragroup conflict. (2007, background): “cooperate, share information) because, for example, a trusting individual believes that his or her interest will be protected by the other parties or group members ( Tidd et al. , 2004”
A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict (2008, background): “However, it appears to function mainly as a mitigating factor in the effect of other antecedents on conflict and on the escalation of conflict (Olson et al., 2007; Peterson & Behfar, 2003; Tidd et al., 2004).”
Zeileis Conditional Variable Importance for Random Forests (2015, background): “Based on these results, we assume that harsh forms of regulation could promote a task conflict evolving to a relationship conflict over time [78], which should be investigated in longitudinal studies in the future.”