A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Conflict in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences of Process Conflict (2011, methodology): “In fact, relationship conflict is often so highly negatively correlated with such outcomes as satisfaction, commitment, and coordination that it is more predictive of those outcomes (and of performance) than either task or process conflict (Korsgaard et al., 2008).”
Team identification, trust and conflict: a mediation model (2010, background): “At the same time, dyadic and intragroup conflicts are social phenomena that are manifested at higher levels of analysis (i.e. the dyad or the group as a whole; e.g. Fink, 1968; Jehn and Bendersky, 2003)” (Korsgaard et al., 2008, p. 1224).”
The Relation Between Ethical Leadership and Workplace Conflicts: The Mediating Role of Employee Resolution Efficacy (2016, background): “Second, as Jehn, Rispens, and Thatcher (2010) argued, individuals’ experience of relationship, task, and process conflict differs from one another as the lack of symmetry induces different attitudes and behaviors, and could stem from individuals’ perceptions of social influences, values or beliefs (”
Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: Trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination (2019, background): “works show correlations between the two kinds of conflict [24, 30, 31, 32]: that is, if A trusts B, then A is”