G. Ares

Food Science · 2007–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 45 papers; trusts 45 researchers and is trusted by 35 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Food Science — 376 citations into it; #59 of 1,700 by trust here, #20 by citations
Social Psychology — 152 citations into it; #5,569 of 15,694 by trust here, #2,335 by citations
Nutrition and Dietetics — 127 citations into it; #57 of 1,029 by trust here, #50 by citations
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 109 citations into it; #2,681 of 9,731 by trust here, #882 by citations
Marketing — 67 citations into it; #4,892 of 6,289 by trust here, #2,634 by citations
Animal Science and Zoology — 58 citations into it; #36 of 476 by trust here, #67 by citations
Plant Science — 52 citations into it
Artificial Intelligence — 45 citations into it

Whom G. Ares trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

Who trusts G. Ares overall

Papers from G. Ares's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers G. Ares trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

Visual attention by consumers to check-all-that-apply questions: Insights to support methodological development
Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. (British Journal of Social Psychology)
Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. (Science of the Total Environment)
Food Waste Paradox: Antecedents of Food Disposal in Low-Income Households
A Factorial Approach for Sorting Task data (FAST)
Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050 (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences)
Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action
Sorting out food waste behaviour: A survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reported amounts of food waste in households
Ultra‐processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system (Obesity Reviews)

Their papers

Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis (2010) — 357 citations
Buy, eat or discard? A case study with apples to explore fruit quality perception and food waste (2018) — 113 citations
Methodological issues in cross-cultural sensory and consumer research (2018) — 123 citations
Convenience or price orientation? Consumer characteristics influencing food waste behaviour in the context of an emerging country and the impact on future sustainability of the global food sector (2018) — 113 citations
Emoji questionnaires can be used with a range of population segments: Findings relating to age, gender and frequency of emoji/emoticon use (2017) — 91 citations
Future directions in sensory and consumer science: Four perspectives and audience voting (2017) — 90 citations
Trained vs. consumer panels for analytical testing: Fueling a long lasting debate in the field (2017) — 142 citations
Hedonic product optimisation: CATA questions as alternatives to JAR scales (2017) — 50 citations
Can emoji be used as a direct method to measure emotional associations to food names? Preliminary investigations with consumers in USA and China (2017) — 98 citations
Dominant meanings of facial emoji: insights from Chinese consumers and comparison with meanings from internet resources (2017) — 96 citations
Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Food Science and Technology (2017) — 86 citations
Consumers' attention to functional food labels: Insights from eye-tracking and change detection in a case study with probiotic milk (2016) — 93 citations
Use of emoticon and emoji in tweets for food-related emotional expression (2016) — 153 citations
Do we all perceive food-related wellbeing in the same way?: Results from an exploratory cross-cultural study (2016) — 94 citations
Comparison of rate-all-that-apply (RATA) and check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions across seven consumer studies (2016) — 120 citations
On the analysis of Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) data (2016) — 170 citations
Comparison of intensity scales and CATA questions in new product development: Sensory characterisation and directions for product reformulation of milk desserts (2015) — 91 citations
Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization by consumers: Investigations into the number of terms used in CATA questions (2015) — 170 citations
Using Twitter data for food-related consumer research: A case study on “what people say when tweeting about different eating situations” (2015) — 127 citations
Comparison of sensory product profiles generated by trained assessors and consumers using CATA questions: Four case studies with complex and/or similar samples (2015) — 114 citations