Deborah L. Whetzel

Social Psychology · 2006–2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 23 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Social Psychology — 19 citations into it
• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 18 citations into it; #5,144 of 8,741 by trust here, #6,799 by citations
• Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 15 citations into it; #569 of 2,368 by trust here, #713 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 14 citations into it; #8,081 of 12,932 by trust here, #3,893 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 11 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 8 citations into it
• Applied Psychology — 7 citations into it

Whom Deborah L. Whetzel trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Michael A. McDaniel
2. Jeff A. Weekley
3. Richard L. Tweedie
4. Robert E. Ployhart
5. H. Cooper
6. Mark Dodgson
7. S. Thompson
8. N. Nguyen
9. L. M. Hough
10. Nathan S. Hartman

Who trusts Deborah L. Whetzel overall

1. M. C. Campion
2. Robert E. Ployhart
3. Richard L. Griffith
4. Michael A. McDaniel
5. Sven Kepes
6. Filip Lievens
7. William I. MacKenzie
8. Leah Wolfeld
9. G. Banks

Papers from Deborah L. Whetzel's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Deborah L. Whetzel trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Practice and Constructs Assessed
2. SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS, RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS, AND VALIDITY: A META‐ANALYSIS
3. Situational Judgment and Job Performance
4. Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned
5. How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (Statistics in Medicine)
6. Editorial
7. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
8. Effects of Response Instructions on Faking a Situational Judgment Test
9. Psychological Bulletin: Editorial.
10. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results

Their papers

• PUBLICATION BIAS: A CASE STUDY OF FOUR TEST VENDORS (2006) — 138 citations
• Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research (2009) — 194 citations
• Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2008) — 167 citations
• SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS, RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS, AND VALIDITY: A META‐ANALYSIS (2007) — 455 citations