Situational Judgment and Job Performance
By D. Chan, Neal Schmitt. 2002
234 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57d0f550c540823d2bfd9a5281c5ae1df1edcf19
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- T. Rench
- Samantha K. Baard
- N. Nguyen
- Filip Lievens
- Wayne A. Hochwarter
- Michael A. McDaniel
- I. Jawahar
- Helga Peeters
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Gerald R. Ferris
- Darren C. Treadway
- Robert W. Kolodinsky
- Michael A. McDaniel
- Wayne A. Hochwarter
- Deborah L. Whetzel
- Stéphane Côté
- Filip Lievens
Citations in the corpus
- Political skill and influence effectiveness: Testing portions of an expanded Ferris and Judge (1991) model (2007, background): “Given that contextual performance is now readily accepted as an important component of the overall job performance picture (e.g. Chan & Schmitt, 2002; Griffin et al., 2000; Judge et al., 2006; Motowidlo et al., 1997), we believe that our findings make a nice contribution to the field’s overall…”
- Self-Efficacy and Political Skill as Comparative Predictors of Task and Contextual Performance: A Two-Study Constructive Replication (2008, background): “In another study, Chan and Schmitt (2002) reported that cognitive ability correlated with task performance but not with contextual performance, whereas conscientiousness correlated with job dedication but not with either interpersonal facilitation or task performance.”
- Performance Adaptation (2014, background): “Defined this way, adaptability is considered to be a relatively stable trait that is generalizable across situations (Chan & Schmitt, 2002).”
- Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2008, background): “In other words, to the extent that specific SJTs consist of situations that are cognitively demanding, race differences will be large ( Chan & Schmitt, 2002 , 2005 ).”
- The State of Research on Situational Judgment Tests: A Content Analysis and Directions for Future Research (2014, unknown): “These reliability estimates are often reported for those studies with the objective of developing and validating alternate forms (e.g., Lievens & Sackett, 2007) or when two or more versions of the “same” test are used (e.g., Chan & Schmitt, 2002).”
- Situational Judgment Tests and their Predictiveness of College Students’ Success: The Influence of Faking (2005, background): “SJTs are developed for a specific criterion because their items are directly developed or sampled from the criterion behaviors that the SJTs are designed to predict ( Chan & Schmitt, 2002 ).”
- Personnel selection. (2008, background): “Similarly, SJTs had incremental validity over cognitive ability, experience, and personality (Chan & Schmitt 2002, Clevenger et al. 2001).”
- Emotional Intelligence, Cognitive Intelligence, and Job Performance (2006, background): “Cognitive intelligence is positively related to the dimensions of job performance—task performance and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)—in most, if not all jobs (Motowidlo and Van Scotter, 1994; Schmidt and Hunter, 1998; Chan and Schmitt, 2002).”