Psychological Bulletin: Editorial.

By H. Cooper. 2003

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea33b4bd1b79294b432b5e7151de352fa67b8c25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Understanding the factors that determine workplace coaching effectiveness: a systematic literature review (2018, background): “A systematic review aims to address the research objective by identifying, critically evaluating, synthesizing and integrating the findings of relevant research (Cooper, 2003).”
Performance, incentives, and needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: a meta-analysis (2016, background): “We have of course taken recommended steps to reduce threats to the validity of our findings (Cooper 2003), such as subjectivity (Eysenck 1994) and various checks for publication bias (Aguinis et al. 2011).”
A systematic literature review of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans (2010, background): “…A systematic li Intelligence (2009), doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.05.002 Bulletin puts it: “[Those] who accumulate and integrate other people's data ought to be held to similar standards of methodological rigor as the researchers whose evidence forms the bases of their review” (Cooper, 2003, p. 3).”
PUBLICATION BIAS: A CASE STUDY OF FOUR TEST VENDORS (2006, methodology): “This procedure, trim and fill (Duval & Tweedie, 2000a, 2000b), has been used widely in the healthcare literature and is increasingly used in psychological meta-analyses (e.g., Psychological Bulletin where editorial policy encourages publication bias analyses [Cooper, 2003]).”
Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2008, unknown): “Because publication bias has been found in some industrial/organizational research areas (e.g., the validity of interviews; Duval, 2005), and because publication bias analyses are required in meta-analyses published in Psychological Bulletin (Cooper, 2003), we applied these methods to our data.”
Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: Some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk Factors (2010, methodology): “Meta-analysis has become the accepted method of answering questions concerning the magnitude and direction of empirical relationships (Barbaree, 2005; Cooper, 2003; Hanson & Broom, 2005).”
Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges (2010, background): “Effect sizes are best understood when contextualized and interpreted with respect to other specific effects within a particular discipline (Valentine & Cooper, 2003).”
How Many Studies Do You Need? (2010, background): “For example, Cooper (2003) suggests that a meta-analysis of two studies will likely only be informative if the studies are direct (or ‘‘statistical’’) replications of one another.”
SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS, RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS, AND VALIDITY: A META‐ANALYSIS (2007, methodology): “Because publication bias has been found in some industrial and organizational research areas, and because publication bias analyses are required in meta-analyses published in Psychological Bulletin (Cooper, 2003), we applied these methods to our data.”
Father Involvement and Children's Early Learning: A Critical Review of Published Empirical Work from the Past 15 Years (2008, background): “Although some have argued for inclusion of unpublished work in reviews, such as dissertations (Cooper, 2003 ), this review provides a stringent focus on published articles that have reached the highest levels of scholarly and public scrutiny.”
The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. (2011, unknown): “We conducted an extensive literature search to identify both published and unpublished reports that examined the relationship between FFM traits and citizenship behaviors and therefore to minimize potential publication bias (Cooper, 2003).”
Antecedents and Outcomes of Informal Learning Behaviors: a Meta-Analysis (2018, methodology): “We have followed guidelines put forth by others (Aguinis, Gottfredson & Wright, 2011; Aguinis, Pierce, Bosco, Dalton & Dalton, 2011; Cooper, 2003) to reduce between-coder error and subjectivity, which includes holding multiple discussions, maintaining extensive documentation, examining cross-coder…”
Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. (2010, background): “Because the contours of research examining meaning making are nebulous, an exhaustive review of all relevant literature (Cooper, 2003) is impossible.”
Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research (2011, methodology): “We conducted an extensive electronic and manual search for both published and unpublished transformational leadership studies to minimize publication bias (Cooper, 2003).”
A systematic review of the relationship between rigidity/flexibility and transdiagnostic cognitive and behavioral processes that maintain psychopathology (2018, methodology): “Reviewed studies have used decidedly different methodologies and participant groups, and using meta-analytic approaches in such circumstances can mask important differences in findings (Cooper, 2003; Hinshaw, 2009).”