PUBLICATION BIAS: A CASE STUDY OF FOUR TEST VENDORS
By Michael A. McDaniel, H. Rothstein, Deborah L. Whetzel. 2006
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f16952884b81aa9b8ee8c1e27585a01bfa05e1e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Sven Kepes
- G. Banks
- Ernest H. O’Boyle
- Jonathan A. Shaffer
- Michael A. McDaniel
- Michael T. Brannick
- Matthew W. Rutherford
- J. Pollack
In Statistics and Probability
- G. Banks
- Sven Kepes
- Ernest H. O’Boyle
- Jonathan A. Shaffer
- Michael A. McDaniel
- Michael T. Brannick
- Matthew W. Rutherford
- J. Pollack
Citations in the corpus
- Publication Bias:A call for improved meta-analytic practice in the organizational sciences (2012, methodology): “Finally, we support the recommendations of others (e.g., American Psychological Association, 2010; Banks & McDaniel, 2011; Geyskens et al., 2009; McDaniel et al., 2006; Rothstein et al., 2005b) to include rigorous publication bias analyses in all metaanalytic reviews and to report the results regard”
- A matter of context: A meta‐analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. (2012, background): “First, McDaniel et al. (2006) analyzed validity information provided by four test publishers and found initial evidence that publication bias existed for several of the data sets containing validity studies of personality.”
- Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms' financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects (2012, result): “We introduced this moderator to test whether or not the family involvement–firm performance relation differs between published studies and unpublished studies (McDaniel et al., 2006; Rothstein et al., 2005).”
- Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2008, unknown): “McDaniel, Rothstein, and Whetzel (2006) and others (McDaniel, Hurtz, & Donovan, 2006; McDaniel, McKay, & Rothstein, 2006) have raised the issue of publication bias (Rothstein, Sutton, & Borenstein, 2005) in meta-analyses within industrial and organizational psychology.”