M. A. Britt
Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2004–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 14 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 74 citations into it; #1,158 of 8,223 by trust here, #1,041 by citations
- Education — 61 citations into it; #2,158 of 11,309 by trust here, #1,874 by citations
- Sociology and Political Science — 19 citations into it
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 13 citations into it
- Artificial Intelligence — 9 citations into it; #13,221 of 35,345 by trust here, #16,771 by citations
- Information Systems — 7 citations into it
- Literature and Literary Theory — 7 citations into it
- Social Psychology — 6 citations into it
Whom M. A. Britt trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- A. Graesser
- Murray Singer
- Jean-François Rouet
- Matthew T. McCrudden
- Ivar Bråten
- K. Stanovich
- A. Britt
- Helge I. Strømsø
- Christopher R. Wolfe
- Susan R. Goldman
Who trusts M. A. Britt overall
- Ivar Bråten
- Helge I. Strømsø
- Laura Gil
- Alexandra List
- Sarit Barzilai
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Tobias Richter
- Christopher R. Wolfe
- Johanna Maier
- Jason L. G. Braasch
Papers from M. A. Britt's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. A. Britt trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks
- Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.
- Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information
- Relevance and Goal-Focusing in Text Processing
- Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE
- The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation
- Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks
- The Effects of Goal Instructions and Text on the Generation of Counterarguments During Writing.
- Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust
- Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Learning with Multiple Documents
Their papers
- Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy (2016) — 323 citations
- RESOLV: Readers' Representation of Reading Contexts and Tasks (2017) — 217 citations
- Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information (2014) — 190 citations
- Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Learning with Multiple Documents (2012) — 92 citations
- Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension (2010) — 209 citations
- The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation (2008) — 129 citations
- FACILITATING TEXTUAL INTEGRATION WITH MACRO-STRUCTURE FOCUSING TASKS (2004) — 104 citations
- DISFLUENCIES IN COMPREHENDING ARGUMENTATIVE TEXTS (2004) — 95 citations