DISFLUENCIES IN COMPREHENDING ARGUMENTATIVE TEXTS

By Meredith Larson, M. A. Britt, Aaron A. Larson. 2004

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Argumentation Mining on the Web from Information Seeking Perspective (2014, background): “…1991; Walton et al., 2008), informal and formal logic (Dung, 1995; Henkemans, 2000; Stoianovici, 2009; Schneider et al., 2013; Hunter, 2013), educational research (Weinberger and Fischer, 2006; Noroozi et al., 2013), pragmatics (Xu and Wu, 2014), psychology (Larson et al., 2004), and many others.”
Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information (2014, background): “M. Larson et al. (2004) found that for all skill levels, the presence of explicit markers for argument elements led to better comprehension of a set of arguments.”
The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model (2011, unknown): “…needed for some students (Duschl & Osborne, 2002; Forman, Larreamendy-Joerns, Stein, & Brown, 1998; Jimenez-Aleixandre, Rodrigues, & Duschl, 2000; Kelly, Druker, & Chen, 1998; Kuhn, 1993; A. Larson, Britt, & Kurby, 2009; M. Larson et al., 2004; Osborne, Erduran, & Simon, 2004; Takao & Kelly, 2003).”