I. M. Gómez-Chacón

Education · 2000–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom I. M. Gómez-Chacón trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Erik De Corte
  2. Jonathan Evans
  3. Alan H. Schoenfeld
  4. K. Stanovich

Who trusts I. M. Gómez-Chacón overall

  1. G. Goldin
  2. Valerie A. DeBellis
  3. Jinfa Cai
  4. M. Callejo
  5. M. Vandecandelaere

Papers from I. M. Gómez-Chacón's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers I. M. Gómez-Chacón trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?
  2. Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?
  3. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
  4. Beliefs and Attitudes in Mathematics Education: New Research Results
  5. Mainstreams and Perspectives in Research on Learning (Mathematics) From Instruction
  6. Intuition in Science and Mathematics: An Educational Approach
  7. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Reversing figure and ground in the rationality debate: An evolutionary perspective
  8. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
  9. Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach.
  10. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of

Their papers