Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
By Daniel Kahneman, Shane Frederick. 2002
3,184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4069615a36c33e61ca309b8ceaeb628a10d441b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- George Loewenstein
- A. Glöckner
- Itamar Simonson
- Cilia Witteman
- Jonathan Evans
- Ravi K. Dhar
- Francesca Gino
- Ann-Katrin Herbold
In General Decision Sciences
- Jonathan Evans
- K. Stanovich
- A. Glöckner
- Daniel Kahneman
- Paul Slovic
- Cilia Witteman
- M. Toplak
- Norbert Schwarz
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Jonathan Evans
- Daniel Kahneman
- K. Stanovich
- Keith Frankish
- R. F. West
- Daniel M. Oppenheimer
- Diego Fernandez-Duque
- T. Wifall
Citations in the corpus
- Cognitive Biases in Performance Evaluations (2016, background): “It is an ancient idea that human thinking can be divided into two main families: intuition and reflection (Kahneman and Frederick 2002).”
- Errors in Probabilistic Reasoning and Judgment Biases (2018, positive): “Relatedly, the biased belief that one’s own signal is more precise than others’ signals has been argued to be important for understanding trading in financial markets (e.g., Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Subrahmanyam, 1998), as well as for social learning and voting; this bias is discussed in Chapter XXX”
- Two Is Not Always Better Than One (2009, neutral): “Kelso and Engstrom (2006) have recently discussed the existence of a large set of phenomena that are all both contrary and complementary. According to their analysis, contradictory mental states are to be expected in any sufficiently complex system. Indeed, intrasystem conflicts are not difficult to”
- Modeling the interplay between affect and deliberation. (2015, background): “…of thinking—for example, controlled versus automatic processes (Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977), symbolic and associative processes (Sloman, 1996; Smith & DeCoster, 2000), impulsive and reflective processes (Lieberman, 2003; Strack & Deutsch, 2004), and System I and II (Kahneman & Frederick , 2002).”
- MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE (2003, methodology): “Kahneman and Frederick (2002) illustrated this conception by a study by Strack, Martin, and Schwarz (1988), in which college students answered a sur- vey that included these two questions: “How happy are you with your life in general?” and “How many dates did you have last month?”.”
- A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (2003, methodology): “As in the case of extension neglect, however, conjunction errors are less robust in within-participant conditions, especially when the task involves a direct comparison (see Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, for a discussion).”
- I Follow My Heart and We Rely on Reasons: The Impact of Self-Construal on Reliance on Feelings versus Reasons in Decision Making (2015, background): “For example, affective, feelingbased decision making tends to be faster (Pham et al. 2001) and more automatic (Zajonc 1980); in contrast, cognitive, reason-based decision making tends to be slower (Pham et al. 2001) and more deliberate (Kahneman and Frederick 2002).”