How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models (2011, background): “Additionally, both Evans (2008, 2009) and Stanovich (2004, 2011) have discussed how terms such as System 1 or heuristic system are really misnomers because they imply that what is being referred to is a singular system.”
The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory (2014, background): “The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory”
Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing (2012, background): “Dual-process theories of cognition have received a large share of attention in the last decade (Evans 2008, 2010; Evans and Frankish 2009; Kahneman and Frederick 2002; Lieberman 2003, 2007; Stanovich 2004, 2011).”
The dual processes hypothesis in mathematics performance: Beliefs, cognitive reflection, working memory and reasoning (2014, background): “As diverse authors have claimed (Evans, 2009; Thompson, 2010), the metacognitive processes are in charge of the activation of workingmemory, aswell as the resolution of possible conflicts between the outputs of Systems 1 and 2.”