Jakob D. Jensen

Applied Psychology · 2005–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 22 researchers and is trusted by 16 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Applied Psychology — 39 citations into it; #688 of 3,868 by trust here, #1,285 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 30 citations into it; #3,982 of 22,756 by trust here, #5,938 by citations
• Literature and Literary Theory — 28 citations into it; #500 of 2,496 by trust here, #463 by citations
• Social Psychology — 24 citations into it
• General Decision Sciences — 9 citations into it
• General Health Professions — 7 citations into it
• Marketing — 7 citations into it; #5,516 of 6,289 by trust here, #4,183 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 6 citations into it

Whom Jakob D. Jensen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Angela Y. Lee
2. Amos Tversky
3. Daniel Kahneman
4. P. Keller
5. Jennifer L. Aaker
6. Andrew F. Hayes
7. Daniel J. O'Keefe
8. Christopher J. Carpenter
9. L. Hedges
10. Jennifer Greene

Who trusts Jakob D. Jensen overall

1. David Gal
2. James Price Dillard
3. Arvid Erlandsson
4. Daniel J. O'Keefe
5. Robin L. Nabi
6. Tobias Reynolds-Tylus
7. Xiaoli Nan
8. Kiwon Seo
9. Chun-Tuan Chang
10. Kristel M. Gallagher

Papers from Jakob D. Jensen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jakob D. Jensen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.
2. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
3. Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
4. The Influence of Presumed Influence
5. Random Effects Models
6. Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
7. Handbook of communication and social interaction skills
8. The Advantages of Compliance or the Disadvantages of Noncompliance? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relative Persuasive Effectiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages
9. The Practice of Social influence in Multiple Cultures
10. Framing, gender and tax compliance

Their papers

• The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Detection Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review (2009) — 515 citations
• Third‐Person Effects and the Environment: Social Distance, Social Desirability, and Presumed Behavior (2005) — 110 citations
• The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review (2007) — 621 citations
• The Advantages of Compliance or the Disadvantages of Noncompliance? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relative Persuasive Effectiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages (2006) — 286 citations
• Do Loss-Framed Persuasive Messages Engender Greater Message Processing Than Do Gain-Framed Messages? A Meta-Analytic Review (2008) — 213 citations
• The Health Belief Model as an Explanatory Framework in Communication Research: Exploring Parallel, Serial, and Moderated Mediation (2014) — 922 citations