The Influence of Presumed Influence

By Albert C. Gunther, J. Douglas Storey. 2003

565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fbd2fd5296109f29205e545afe00ccca7745bdf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

On the Effect of the “Third-Person Effect”: Perceived Influence of Media Coverage and Residential Mobility Intentions (2003, background): “Guided by past findings on third-person perceptions (Cohen et al., 1988; Gunther, 1991; Gunther & Storey, 2003; Perloff, 1989), we modeled this construct as an endogenous variable affected by exposure, involvement, and perceptions of negative coverage.”
How Media Contribute to Misperceptions of Social Norms About Sex (2006, background): “A more recent study (Gunther & Storey, 2003) found that health clients in Nepal believed that a radio health education program was having significant effects on health workers; as a result, clients themselves developed more positive evaluations of health workers’ job performance.”
Unintended Effects of Health Communication Campaigns (2007, unknown): “The typology indicates, however, that these are only part of the reason; nor can these be explained away by the third-person effect (Davidson, 1983) or presumed influence models (Gunther & Storey, 2003).”
Presumed Influence on Peer Norms: How Mass Media Indirectly Affect Adolescent Smoking (2006, background): “In one, evaluation of a radio campaign to improve maternal health care delivery in Nepal revealed that, although the campaign had no direct effect on general public attitudes toward clinic health workers, there was a significant indirect campaign effect (Gunther & Storey, 2003).”
A Three-Decade Retrospective on the Hostile Media Effect (2015, unknown): “Yet, drawing on the third-person effect (Davison, 1983; Perloff, 2009) and the concept of presumed influence (Gunther & Storey, 2003), hostile media perceptions can precipitate media effects by setting in motion a series of beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors.”
Third‐Person Effects and the Environment: Social Distance, Social Desirability, and Presumed Behavior (2005, background): “Researchers have found no links (Gunther, 1991; Price, Tewksbury, & Huang, 1998), partial links (Atwood, 1994; Tewksbury, Moy, & Weis, 2004), and strong links (Gunther & Storey, 2003; Tsfati & Cohen, 2003) between perception and behavior.”
Does Perceived Message Effectiveness Cause Persuasion or Vice Versa? 17 Consistent Answers (2007, background): “For example, Heider (1958) asserts that individuals prefer that their evaluative relationships exist in harmony with one another.”
Social Media Effects on Young Women’s Body Image Concerns: Theoretical Perspectives and an Agenda for Research (2014, background): “This section articulates the hypothesized impacts of transportation (Green et al. 2004), identification (Moyer-Gusé 2008), and normative considerations set in motion by presumed media influence (Gunther and Storey 2003).”
The SAGE handbook of persuasion : developments in theory and practice (2012, methodology): “Drawing on the previous work on “persuasive press inference” (Gunther, 1998), Gunther and Storey (2003) delineate a few consecutive steps to describe the indirect route from message to behavioral outcomes.”
Understanding the Third‐Person Perception: Evidence From a Meta‐Analysis (2008, background): “As depicted in the ‘‘negative influence corollary’’ (Gunther & Storey, 2003), TPP typically occurs for messages with presumed undesirable social influences.”