The Advantages of Compliance or the Disadvantages of Noncompliance? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relative Persuasive Effectiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages
By Daniel J. O'Keefe, Jakob D. Jensen. 2006
286 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19ea7642464d1ecc0304ae19f28beecdc61b2ea7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Marketing
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Boomerang Effect A Synthesis of Findings and a Preliminary Theoretical Framework (2009, background): “…communication researchers have also examined whether we should highlight the gains or losses associated with a certain issue (for the theoretical foundation of gain and loss frames, see Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981, as well as related review by O’Keefe & Jensen, 2006).”
- Social Distance, Framing, and Judgment: A Construal Level Perspective (2007, unknown): “…Communication Association 491 persuasive communication (e.g., Block & Keller, 1995; Davis, 1995; Maheswaran & Meyers-Levy, 1990; Meyerowitz & Chaiken, 1987; Mitchell, 2001; Rothman, Bartels, Wlaschin, & Salovey, 2006; Umphrey, 2003; for reviews, see O’Keefe & Jensen, 2006, in press-a, in press-b).”
- Do Loss-Framed Persuasive Messages Engender Greater Message Processing Than Do Gain-Framed Messages? A Meta-Analytic Review (2008, background): “…research has addressed the question of the relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed persuasive appeals (for some reviews, see O’Keefe & Jensen, 2006; Salovey, Schneider, & Apanovitch, 2002), but it is an open question whether gain- and loss-framed appeals systematically…”
- The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review (2007, background): “Overall effect O’Keefe and Jensen’s (2006) review concluded that gain- and loss-framed appeals do not significantly differ in persuasiveness concerning disease detection behaviors.”