Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
By Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky. 1979
Subfields: Game & Decision Theory, Cognitive Science & Psychology, Economics & Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Game & Decision Theory
- Bent Flyvbjerg
- Michael H. Birnbaum
- Javier Estrada
- C. Starmer
- Henrich R. Greve
- John E. Grable
- Han Bleichrodt
- Andrew W. Lo
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
- Bent Flyvbjerg
- Michael H. Birnbaum
- Jonathan Evans
- A. Chernev
- Ariel Rubinstein
- Javier Estrada
- C. Starmer
- Han Bleichrodt
In Economics & Operations Research
- Michael H. Birnbaum
- Bent Flyvbjerg
- A. Chernev
- Ariel Rubinstein
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Nicholas Barberis
- Ming Huang
- Itamar Simonson
Citations in the corpus
- Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Tooling (2021, background): “Loss aversion (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahne-man, 1991) is a robust effect of people’s risk evaluation.”
- Twitter mood predicts the stock market (2010, background): “We know from psychological research that emotions, in addition to information, play an significant role in human decision-making [16], [18], [39].”
- Effects of Marriage and Children on Financial Risk Tolerance: A Synthesis of Family Development and Prospect Theory (2003, methodology): “A third model, prospect theory ( Kahneman & Tversky, 1979 ), represents a much greater divergence from the standard utility maximization model.”
- The Effect of Explicit Reference Points on Consumer Choice and Online Bidding Behavior (2005, unknown): “…has received a great deal of attention from both marketing and decision researchers (e.g., Brenner et al. 1999; Dhar et al. 1999; Kahneman 1992; Kahneman and Tversky 1979; Puto 1986; Winer 1986), there has not been much work that examined the impact of explicit reference points on consumer…”
- Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach (2005, background): “Building upon theoretical results from Prospect Theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979), he argues that strategic behavior may only emerge for respondents who answer " yes " to the first price offer, while incentives for the others would be unaltered across elicitation questions.”
- Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences (2012, background): “As we show, these violations in our baseline cannot be explained by non-EU concepts such as prospect theory probability weighting (Kahneman and Tversky 1979; Tversky and Kahneman 1992; Tversky and Fox 1995), temporally dependent probability weighting (Halevy 2008), or preferences for early…”
- Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products (2009, background): “This can be reasonably explained by the prospect theory of Kahneman and Tversky (1979), which argues that consumers prefer avoiding risks to capturing gains.”
- Personality and domain‐specific risk taking (2005, background): “The first theme relates to expected utility theories, of which prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) is a much-cited example.”
- Getting the word out: Enforcement information dissemination and compliance behavior (2009, unknown): “Perhaps the simplest way is suggested by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), who incorporate what they term a “reference point” as a form of social norm in prospect theory.”
- Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing Our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research (2007, background): “The public, based on what is termed the certainty effect, tends to overweight certain outcomes while discounting those that are less so (Kahneman and Tversky 1979).”
- The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review (2007, background): “The most common explanatory framework invokes prospect-theoretic reasoning to suggest that potential losses are more motivating than potential gains when risky actions are contemplated, but gains are more motivating than losses for low-risk behaviors (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979).”