Toward modeling the predictors of managerial career success: does gender matter?

By K. Eddleston, David C. Baldridge, John F. Veiga. 2004

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe8b28b8767656022f318f697310a0ee6b951806

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. E. Kossek
2. Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
3. Lynn A. McFarland
4. Ans De Vos
5. A. Hirschi
6. J. B. Rodell
7. Beatrice van der Heijden
8. Gary N. Powell

In Social Psychology

1. E. Kossek
2. Lynn A. McFarland
3. Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
4. Jill E. Ellingson
5. Jarrod M. Haar
6. Tammy D. Allen
7. J. B. Rodell
8. Kristen M Shockley

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. Kossek
2. Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
3. Jill E. Ellingson
4. Lynn A. McFarland
5. Tammy D. Allen
6. Jarrod M. Haar
7. Kristen M Shockley
8. Marcello Russo

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory (2011, background): “2 Marketability engenders a sense that an individual has what the organization desires ( Eby, Butts, & Lockwood, 2003 ; Eddleston, Baldridge, & Veiga, 2004 ).”
• The Contemporary Career: A Work–Home Perspective (2014, background): “Mainiero& Sullivan (2005) have argued that women view their careers broadly through a lens of relationalism that focuses on the needs of other people outside and inside of their organization as opposed tomen’s agentic orientation that stresses their personal achievements at work.”