Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review
By P. D. Harms, Marcus Crede, M. Tynan, Matthew R. Leon, Wonho Jeung. 2017
458 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fca7eeb051a5263ff9e7a0c033a5bccf2c643805
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Sheena Johnson
- Antonia J. Kaluza
- Feng Wei
- Rolf van Dick
- Chris W. L. Chu
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Diana Boer
- S. Willis
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Anouk Decuypere
- Rolf van Dick
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- I. Inceoglu
- Antonia J. Kaluza
- N. Junker
- Franziska Weber
- Diana Boer
In Social Psychology
- Anouk Decuypere
- Rolf van Dick
- Antonia J. Kaluza
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- N. Junker
- Franziska Weber
- I. Inceoglu
- Diana Boer
Citations in the corpus
- Leader Mindfulness and Employee Performance: A Sequential Mediation Model of LMX Quality, Interpersonal Justice, and Employee Stress (2018, unknown): “Meta-analytic research suggests that leader stress influences leader behaviors and these leader behaviors, in turn, influence employee stress (Harms et al. 2017).”
- Leadership behaviour and leader self-reported well-being: A review, integration and meta-analytic examination (2020, background): “However, previous reviews have mostly focused on one, or only a few, specific leadership behaviours and one, or only a few, specific well-being measures (Harms et al., 2017; Joseph, Dhanani, Shen, McHugh, & McCord, 2015).”
- When and how health‐oriented leadership relates to employee well‐being—The role of expectations, self‐care, and LMX (2021, background): “…oriented leadership, leader– member exchange, leadership, self- care years (Linnan et al., 2019), researchers have only recently begun to turn the spotlight to leaders and the question which leadership behaviors promote employee well- being and how (e.g., Harms et al., 2017; Montano et al., 2017).”
- Workplace team resilience: A systematic review and conceptual development (2020, background): “Leaders may serve as a source of guidance and support for team members to manage any disruptions successfully (Harms et al., 2017; Yukelson & Weinberg, 2016).”
- Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms (2020, background): “For example, leader’s stress levels as well as mindfulness levels influence leadership (Decuypere et al., 2019; Harms et al., 2017).”
- Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda (2018, background): “Furthermore, most of the studies in our review focused on positive forms of well-being, but with increasing interest in leadership research on negative forms of follower well-being such as stress (Harms et al., 2017) and burnout (e.”
- Green HRM and psychological safety: how transformational leadership drives follower’s job satisfaction (2020, background): “Review of recent transformational leadership research underscores its significance in forecasting important job outcomes such that task efficiency, organization citizenship behaviour, well-being and turnover intention (Clarkson et al., 2020; Crede et al., 2019; Gang Wang et al., 2011; Gui et al., 20”