Reporting and Interpreting Quantitative Research Findings: What Gets Reported and Recommendations for the Field.

By Jenifer Larson-Hall, Luke Plonsky. 2015

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f601bd02af5d420f1f644d71f8166e306706fc53

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

The seven sins of L2 research: A review of 30 journals’ statistical quality and their CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, JCR Impact Factors (2019, background): “Larson-Hall and Plonsky (2015) pointed out that the most commonly used reliability coefficients in the field are Cronbach’s α (for internal consistency) and Cohen’s κ (interrater reliability).”
Task-Based Learner Production: A Substantive and Methodological Review (2016, methodology): “However, the types of graphic techniques employed were rarely effective (see Hudson, 2015; Larson-Hall & Plonsky, 2015).”
SECOND LANGUAGE ANXIETY AND ACHIEVEMENT (2019, background): “Most of the studies also failed to report basic information concerning their language achievement measures, including descriptive statistics, a perennial weakness in L2 research (e.g., Larson-Hall & Plonsky, 2015; Paquot & Plonsky, 2017; Plonsky, 2013).”
MULTIPLE REGRESSION AS A FLEXIBLE ALTERNATIVE TO ANOVA IN L2 RESEARCH (2016, result): “Thus, failing to report SDs prevents d values from being calculated, and this often prevents studies from being included in meta-analyses (Larson-Hall & Plonsky, 2015; Norris & Ortega, 2006) and from undergoing thorough comparisons with findings in subsequent replication studies.”
Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field. (2018, background): “…Derrick, 2016), poor transparency of materials (Marsden & Mackey, 2012; Marsden et al., 2016; Marsden, Thompson, & Plonsky, accepted), and very scarce availability of data (Larson-Hall & Plonsky, 2015; Larson-Hall, 2017; Plonsky, Egbert, & LaFlair, 2015) (see Marsden (in press) for an overview).”
A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research (2020, background): “Others, however, address one or more practices across domains, such as: mixed methods (Hashemi and Babaii, 2013); reporting practices (Larson-Hall and Plonsky, 2015); replication research (Marsden et al., 2018a); quantitative analyses and reporting practices (Plonsky, 2013, 2014); study designs…”
TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis (2019, background): “Notes In the spirit of synthetic ethics (e.g. Larson-Hall & Plonsky, 2015; Norris & Ortega, 2000, 2006), all materials from this study, including the coding scheme and raw data, can be accessed at the following website: https://sites.google.com/site/toddhavilandmckay (accessed November 2017).”
Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. (2017, methodology): “Full meta-compliant recommendations for good reporting can be found in Larson-Hall and Plonsky (2015).”
Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage (2018, background): “First, although effect sizes are regularly reported, they are not often interpreted and even less often are they interpreted meaningfully (see Larson-Hall and Plonsky, 2015; Plonsky and Oswald, 2014).”