Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account
By Peter A. Bamberger, Samuel B. Bacharach. 2006
251 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eec116e9353d79231a7eb351d0b77687de681e42
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Bennett J. Tepper
- K. Thompson
- Marie S. Mitchell
- Staale Einarsen
- M. B. Nielsen
- Robert Folger
- Kerry Newness
- Kris Duniewicz
In General Health Professions
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Staale Einarsen
- Marie S. Mitchell
- Jesse S. Michel
- M. B. Nielsen
- Hui Liao
- Jun Liu
- S. Restubog
- Dong Liu
Citations in the corpus
- Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision (2011, background): “For example, Bamberger and Bacharach (2006) found that high levels of abusive supervision did not increase the resistance behavior for employees high in conscientiousness and agreeableness.”
- How Abusive Supervision Affects Workplace Deviance: A Moderated-Mediation Examination of Aggressiveness and Work-Related Negative Affect (2016, background): “2005; Mitchell and Ambrose 2007); and poor health outcomes such as negative mood, loss of selfesteem, problem drinking, psychological distress, and burnout (Bamberger and Bacharach 2006; Burton and Hoobler 2006; Tepper 2000; Yagil et al. 2011).”
- My Family Made Me Do It: A Cross-Domain, Self-Regulatory Perspective on Antecedents to Abusive Supervision (2016, background): “Forexample, abusivesupervision isassociated with outcomes ranging from poor performance (Peng, Schaubroeck, & Li, 2014) and deviant work behavior (Mitchell &Ambrose, 2007), to alcoholism (Bamberger & Bacharach, 2006) and family undermining (Hoobler & Brass, 2006).”
- Moving from Abuse to Reconciliation: A Power-Dependence Perspective on When and How a Follower Can Break the Spiral of Abuse (2017, background): “Followers engage in coping strategies to manage the psychological distress introduced by abusive supervision, including alcohol use (Bamberger & Bacharach,2006), psychologicalwithdrawal (Mawritz, Dust, & Resick, 2014), or upward maintenance communication (Tepper, Moss, Lockhart, & Carr, 2007).”
- Predictors of Abusive Supervision: Supervisor Perceptions of Deep-Level Dissimilarity, Relationship Conflict, and Subordinate Performance (2011, background): “…is associated with serious negative outcomes for victims and employers, including psychological distress (Tepper, 2000), problem drinking (Bamberger & Bacharach, 2006), and aggression directed against a victim’s supervisor (Dupre, Inness, Connelly, Barling, & Hoption, 2006; Inness,…”
- Mirror, mirror on my boss’s wall: Engaged enactment’s moderating role on the relationship between perceived narcissistic supervision and work outcomes (2012, result): “In contrast, research has identified enactment-related personality factors (e.g. conscientiousness and agreeableness; Bamberger and Bacharach, 2006) capable of neutralizing threat-performance relationships.”
- The depleted leader: The influence of leaders' diminished psychological resources on leadership behaviors ☆ ☆☆ (2014, background): “The majority of this research, however, has been concerned with the effects of good and bad leadership on subordinates' well-being (e.g., Bamberger & Bacharach, 2006; Kelloway, Turner, Barling, & Loughlin, 2012) or the impact of leaders' stress on employees' stress (Skagert, Dellve, Eklöf,…”
- A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions (2011, background): “According to Barrick et al. (2003), jobs with high autonomy allow employees to behave in idiosyncratic ways; hence, the validity of personality is likely to be higher in jobs with high as opposed to low-autonomy.”
- Exposure to workplace harassment and the Five Factor Model of personality: A meta-analysis (2017, background): “The relationships between personality and exposure to workplace harassment have been examined in a range of studies (e.g., Bamberger & Bacharach, 2006; Bowling, Beehr, Bennett, & Watson, 2010; Milam, Spitzmueller, & Penney, 2009).”