A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions
By Lisa M. Penney, Emily M. David, L. Witt. 2011
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/805d01e6554d6d17a744ed8d92a3340704409e93
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Alexandra Panaccio
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Neal Schmitt
- Linda Koopmans
- John P. Meyer
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Émilie Lapointe
Citations in the corpus
- Development of an individual work performance questionnaire (2012, background): “…measures of effectiveness are likely to be more reflective of individual differences in abilities or skills (e.g. cognitive ability, social skill), and are frequently influenced by factors outside the control of the individual (e.g. technical problems, economic influences) (Penney et al., 2011).”
- Five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: The mediating role of positive and negative affective states (2012, background): “Indeed, scholars have called for increased efforts to understand the intervening processes in these relationships (e.g., Penney et al., 2011).”
- Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work (2014, background): “Penney et al. (2011) provided a review of situational moderators of the personality–performance relationship and argued that it is likely that task, social, and organizational variables moderate this relationship.”