Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: investigating generalizability and instrumentality.

By Chun Kit Hui, Cynthia Lee, Denise M. Rousseau. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004

600 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edc2c0fa3ffa69fd66463fcbef4494ebf08a5382

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations (2017, background): “For this reason, it can be argued that a rudimentary framework for PCs already exists in an incipient or transitional state (Hui et al., 2004) when a contact is initially formed between a candidate and the representatives of the organization during the recruitment and selection process (Shore & Tetr”
Psychological Contracts and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Employee Responses to Transactional and Relational Breach (2010, background): “For example, relational contract breach (but not transactional breach) has been directly linked to civic virtue (Robinson and Morrison 1995) and trust (Montes and Irving 2008), whereas transactional (but not relational) breach has been directly linked to cohesion (Ho et al. 2006) and organizational ”
An analysis of employment relationships in Asia using psychological contract theory: A review and research agenda (2020, background): “The behavioral outcomes that have been proposed and empirically tested are organizational citizenship behaviors (VanDyne & Ang, 1998; Hui et al., 2004; Restubog, Bordia & Tang, 2007; Chen, Tsui & Zhang, 2008; Chien & Lin, 2013) and work performance (Hung & Wong, 2007;”
Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement (2014, background): “The organisational milieu and values of people in collectivist societies like India are starkly different from those typically found in a Western context and feature great associative and nurturing needs (Hui et al., 2004).”