Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards)

By Sven Kepes, Michael A. McDaniel, Michael T. Brannick, G. Banks. 2013

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7170a287aa405c7189d60e01625505779802b4e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. (2014, background): “Rather, it is now recognized that the validity of meta-analytic conclusions rests heavily on both the quantity and quality of the available data as well as the appropriateness of the procedures used by the meta-analysts (Kepes et al., 2013).”
Illuminating the ‘Face’ of Justice: A Meta‐Analytic Examination of Leadership and Organizational Justice (2018, unknown): “As suggested by meta-analytic reporting standards (Kepes et al., 2013), the data coding process was guided by a set of protocols.”
Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Review (2017, methodology): “We conducted specific-sample removed sensitivity analyses (Hunter & Schmidt, 2004; Kepes et al., 2013) to assess the extent to which outliers (Aguinis, Gottfredson, & Joo, 2013) potentially influenced the meta-analytically derived estimates.”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “Following meta-analytic reporting standards (Kepes et al. 2013), we report sample sizes, effect sizes, reliability information, and countries where the studies were conducted.”
Advancing Theory by Assessing Boundary Conditions With Metaregression: A Critical Review and Best-Practice Recommendations (2018, methodology): “, T(2)res) and the Knapp and Hartung (2003) method to test the statistical significance of the regression coefficients in the ME model.”
Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Reactions to Organizational Change: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis (2020, background): “Guidelines, such as the meta-analysis reporting standards (American Psychological Association, 2008) and reviews, such as Kepes et al. (2013), have provided detailed recommendations on the methodological issues that should be reported to ensure that meta-analyses are transparent and replicable.”
Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “Evidence for publication bias was analyzed using funnel plots, Egger0s regression tests, and trim‐and‐fill techniques when at least 10 effect sizes were presented for a meta‐analytic correlation (Kepes et al., 2013).”
What is a meta-analysis? (2024, unknown): “9 These guidelines each differ slightly, but generally include identifying inclusion criteria, systematic review search terms, screening processes and methods for data synthesis.”
Doing More with Less: Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms (2016, unknown): “To test our hypotheses, we conducted a meta-analytic study following the established guidelines put forth in management and economics research (Buckley, Devinney, & Tang, 2013; Kepes, McDaniel, Brannick, & Banks, 2013; Stanley et al., 2013).”